Author Topic: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please  (Read 4827 times)

Offline 66RavenGTCoupe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« on: July 22, 2014, 11:35:18 PM »
Here is my Dec 65 Bucked 66. Decal was placed in the exact same place as it was originally prior to the restoration. I made a template of the original position and located it with the front suspension dust cover bolts that go down the side of the shocker tower.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2014, 05:18:31 AM by J_Speegle »
66 Metuchen, NJ  GT Coupe
Raven, Deluxe Black Int
6T07A1612##
BODY  COLOR   TRIM    DATE   DSO   AXLE  TRANS
    65B     A      66           02M     22          1     6
Buck Tag:
C/O  362  (Customer Order, Rotation Number)
5    M7 (Weld Bay 5, Bucked Dec 7)
PIO (Performance Image Option - GT)

Offline bryancobb

  • Silver Level Subscriber
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1077
  • 2009 Ridn' Around
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2014, 06:12:02 AM »
Looks good Raven,

I'm pretty sure your windshield washer bag should have gold lettering instead of white?

Bryan
66 Metuch Conv
Nightmist, Std Blu Int
6T08C223904    76A       K         22       15c     21      6        6
                      BODY  COLOR   TRIM    DATE   DSO   AXLE  XMSN
   C/O  785                                   (rotation #)
   16    C14   6T08C223904        (weld bay 16, bucked MAR 14)

Offline 66RavenGTCoupe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2014, 08:11:39 PM »
Thanks Bryan,
I appreciate the comment and the info on the washer bag. Don't know if you saw it but I actually started a thread on exactly that question as I was unsure so thanks for clearing that up. Was there a changeover date for these or did different plants use different ones?
I would be happy for anyone else to comment on things that they feel are incorrect as well. So don't be shy!
66 Metuchen, NJ  GT Coupe
Raven, Deluxe Black Int
6T07A1612##
BODY  COLOR   TRIM    DATE   DSO   AXLE  TRANS
    65B     A      66           02M     22          1     6
Buck Tag:
C/O  362  (Customer Order, Rotation Number)
5    M7 (Weld Bay 5, Bucked Dec 7)
PIO (Performance Image Option - GT)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2014, 08:56:54 PM »
.......I would be happy for anyone else to comment on things that they feel are incorrect as well. So don't be shy!

This might get carried away (off thread) so we can split this if needed.

Just noticed a few typical things that stand out

1- Shocks

2- unpainted master cylinder

3- looks like the bypass hose and clamps might be unpainted

4- Electrical wire clip on the drivers side radiator support ??? One on the passenger side looks out of position from what I'm use to seeing

5- lack of sealant on the firewall - most noticeable at the heater motor and mounting studs but would expect the electrical connection sealant will be minimal or missing also

6- Red wire covering or something else - mid firewall just uncer the cowl to firewall pinch weld??  In the passenger side picture

Looks like a great job and allot of attention to details :)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 66RavenGTCoupe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2014, 09:23:47 PM »
Thanks Jeff. This feedback is great as I really want to represent this car properly for history's sake.
Just in reply. I'm waiting to restore the original Koni shocks so I have that one covered.   ;)
Upon close inspection of the master cylinder prior to restoration I found no evidence of paint ( plenty of surface rust though!) I researched it and found that they were either raw or black. Is that incorrect? :-\
Need to paint bypass hose and clamps - thanks.   :-[
There was absolutely no evidence of sealant on and around the heater fan and mounts. Could this have been missed on the line? Where would the electrical connection sealant be? I have sealant right across the top of the cowl.
The red thing that you see mid cowl is the neutral safety switch connector  :D that is correct right?
Battery mount is incorrect. Temporary fix while I save for an Autolite Sta Ful. (Christmas can't come fast enough!!)

Thanks again for your feedback so far.
66 Metuchen, NJ  GT Coupe
Raven, Deluxe Black Int
6T07A1612##
BODY  COLOR   TRIM    DATE   DSO   AXLE  TRANS
    65B     A      66           02M     22          1     6
Buck Tag:
C/O  362  (Customer Order, Rotation Number)
5    M7 (Weld Bay 5, Bucked Dec 7)
PIO (Performance Image Option - GT)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2014, 10:24:05 PM »
I'm waiting to restore the original Koni shocks so I have that one covered.

So I'm guessing your playing the dealer installed option thing with the shocks ;)



Upon close inspection of the master cylinder prior to restoration I found no evidence of paint ( plenty of surface rust though!) I researched it and found that they were either raw or black. Is that incorrect? :-\

Must be looking at the MCA rules ;) the only IMHO reason the natural finish is still in the rules is because that was the expected finish from the 70-90's and the powers that be didn't want to upset cars that have been finished and shown for years. Its not unusual for the master cylinders to rust and out be splashed with brake fluid - both will eliminate the paint

At least one box/crate of original assembly line master cylinders was located many years ago - all painted as a unit just like the years that followed.  Also plenty of original cars and pictures have been found to support those findings


There was absolutely no evidence of sealant on and around the heater fan and mounts. Could this have been missed on the line? Where would the electrical connection sealant be? I have sealant right across the top of the cowl.

Could it have been missed on the line - possibly but would have likely been caught by one or more inspectors if it had. Ford had a on going problem with sealing out the water and elements from the interior which was stressed by dealers annually at meetings. These complaints continued for years so I would expect that its something the line inspectors and plant managers too seriously   or should have at least

The product used as an adhesive not like the sound deadeners (thick heavy stuff used in later years) and does not always hold up well or stand out as much as some of the other products  - seam sealer in the trunks and interior for example

As expected I do have a few pictures of the product and patterns applied to NJ cars
 
The red thing that you see mid cowl is the neutral safety switch connector  :D that is correct right?

Not a problem - just stood out in the picture - not sure if I've ever seen it up that high on a car
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 66RavenGTCoupe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
Re: Re: MAR 66 METUCHEN service decal
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2014, 02:57:00 AM »
So I'm guessing your playing the dealer installed option thing with the shocks ;)

Yep. That's my angle! Hehehe!


Must be looking at the MCA rules ;) the only IMHO reason the natural finish is still in the rules is because that was the expected finish from the 70-90's and the powers that be didn't want to upset cars that have been finished and shown for years. Its not unusual for the master cylinders to rust and out be splashed with brake fluid - both will eliminate the paint

At least one box/crate of original assembly line master cylinders was located many years ago - all painted as a unit just like the years that followed.  Also plenty of original cars and pictures have been found to support those findings

Great info! Will repaint when I tackle the front 4 pots.

Could it have been missed on the line - possibly but would have likely been caught by one or more inspectors if it had. Ford had a on going problem with sealing out the water and elements from the interior which was stressed by dealers annually at meetings. These complaints continued for years so I would expect that its something the line inspectors and plant managers too seriously   or should have at least

The product used as an adhesive not like the sound deadeners (thick heavy stuff used in later years) and does not always hold up well or stand out as much as some of the other products  - seam sealer in the trunks and interior for example

As expected I do have a few pictures of the product and patterns applied to NJ cars
 Is love to see those pictures Jeff  8)

Not a problem - just stood out in the picture - not sure if I've ever seen it up that high on a car
Please read above section - I have not worked out how to "quote" and "unquote" yet
Do you have a pic of that too?

Appreciate the invaluable feedback Jeff. This is like gold to me.  :D

This was the original bay....,
66 Metuchen, NJ  GT Coupe
Raven, Deluxe Black Int
6T07A1612##
BODY  COLOR   TRIM    DATE   DSO   AXLE  TRANS
    65B     A      66           02M     22          1     6
Buck Tag:
C/O  362  (Customer Order, Rotation Number)
5    M7 (Weld Bay 5, Bucked Dec 7)
PIO (Performance Image Option - GT)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2014, 05:19:25 AM »
Split the topic - will post some 66 NJ firewall pictures tomorrow - its late ;)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline ChrisV289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1965
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2014, 10:56:08 AM »
Aren't some of the valve cover bolts supposed to be painted as well.  I know it was discussed in another thread...
Chris
1965 Honey Gold Fastback (SJ 10/29/64)
1965 Caspian Blue Fastback (SJ 06/03/65)
2009 V6 Mustang Coupe

Offline Hipo giddyup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There is no end to doing right. Giddyup!!!
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2014, 01:32:42 PM »
 How about the front of the PS pump?? It looks to have been painted with the case. I know the case is painted that "specific" PS color but was the front painted with it as an assembly, left cast, or maybe painted black then assembled??? Asking because I am unsure myself. ;D
1967 Springtime Yellow Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Metuchen built, Nov. 17th 66'
1966 Sahara Beige Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, July 21st 66'
1964 1/2 Pagoda Green Coupe, 260 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, June 30th 64'
1966 GT350 Fastback clone, 289 HiPo, 725cfm Holley, 4spd, SanJose built, Nov 25th 65'

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2014, 01:35:55 PM »
How about the front of the PS pump?? It looks to have been painted with the case. I know the case is painted that "specific" PS color but was the front painted with it as an assembly, left cast, or maybe painted black then assembled??? Asking because I am unsure myself. ;D

Pumps were painted either semi-gloss black or the blue teal color depending on the supplying company (tag will provide that info)

The cast pump, the reservoir/can, tag and retaining nut were all painted as a unit. 66RavenGTCoupe's looks fine unless I'm missing a detail
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Hipo giddyup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There is no end to doing right. Giddyup!!!
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2014, 04:31:13 PM »
Thanks for the clarification. Can you elaborate what on the tag would result to be an all black pump or all teal? Which manufacturer? Thanks
1967 Springtime Yellow Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Metuchen built, Nov. 17th 66'
1966 Sahara Beige Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, July 21st 66'
1964 1/2 Pagoda Green Coupe, 260 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, June 30th 64'
1966 GT350 Fastback clone, 289 HiPo, 725cfm Holley, 4spd, SanJose built, Nov 25th 65'

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2411
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2014, 04:58:51 PM »
ford pumps are teal. just remember 'ford blue'.
5F09C331248

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2014, 08:28:03 PM »
Thanks for the clarification. Can you elaborate what on the tag would result to be an all black pump or all teal? Which manufacturer? Thanks

Take a look at the FAQ's at the top of the 65-66 section - question #7  ;)

There are there since the question gets asked ALL the time - or we knew 5 years ago that you would be asking that exact question today   ::)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: My Dec 65 NJ Mustang - Feedback please
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2014, 09:11:51 PM »
Not sure how many pictures you need - let me post some of the ones that are clearer shots of the product and application. If we need more I can always post others

Working passenger to drivers side. On some took and highlighted the sealant pattern sicne it might not be all that visible in the original picture


#1 PS Firewall






2# PS Firewall





#3 Center Firewall



#4 DS Firewall



#5 DS Firewall/Master Cylinder






#6 DS Electrical Connections




The purpose/goal was to seal every attachment point (except for the engine ground) and pass through on the firewall
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)