Author Topic: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.  (Read 11293 times)

priceless

  • Guest
A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« on: December 01, 2013, 08:34:19 PM »
What is a good definition of a "Survivor" car. I'm having a friendly dispute among a few of us guys in our Mustang club.

What's your definition?

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7686
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2013, 08:52:08 PM »
I'd say a car that looks less than 5 years old, condition-wise and retains a high-degree of original parts and finishes.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline rodster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2013, 08:56:34 PM »
One of those topics that will never come to a conclusion.  ;)  I asked the same question on another forum awhile back and there are many viewpoints, all of which could be valid.

Cars I've seen called survivors are cars stored in a climate controlled environment, with low-to-no miles,  as well as a rusted hulk pulled from the bottom of a lake.

Both represent the ends of the 'survivor' spectrum IMHO.

Good luck settling the 'dispute'.  ;D

 
1965 Dearborn Mustang Coupe
Raven Black - Palomino Pony
1967 Dearborn Mustang Conv.
Wimbeldon White - Red
1984 SVO - 2A

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7343
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2013, 10:31:47 PM »
I think a Mustang dragged from the watery depths and then restored is closer to a "survivor" than a garage queen.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24597
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2013, 12:17:39 AM »
My definition would be same as a nice unrestored original  car. Any Mustang still around today that is mostly together could fall into someones else's definition just not mine ;)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

priceless

  • Guest
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2013, 10:15:18 AM »
That's what I am thinking. unrestored original retaining most, if not all, the original equipment, even the paint,  minus hoses, belts, tires, battery, etc....the preventive maintenance stuff.

Offline Rsanter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2013, 12:12:07 PM »
I think any car that is mostly original, unrestored, unmodified and still in good enough shapento just leave alone is a survivor car.
It can show age, I'm ok with that

Bob
Bob

66 mustang GT conv 289 AT deluxe int - high school car
66 mustang conv 289 -3x2v-4spd deluxe int
68 mustang conv basket case
69 mustang conv 302 AT
66 mustang coupe hotrod/racecar

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9331
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2013, 04:05:41 PM »
I think any car that is mostly original, unrestored, unmodified and still in good enough shapento just leave alone is a survivor car.
It can show age, I'm ok with that

Bob
This part of your definition is a loaded question because apparently many find it hard to under stand what the definition of mostly original ,unrestored, unmodified even means.  I was excited for the 2013 SAAC convention because there were 4 unrestored 67 Shelby's I had to judge. The criteria is very basic and similar to your expectations . It ended up one was legitimate ,one was very marginally so with many replacemate parts ,partial repaint etc.  The other two cars were all highly messed with cars with total repaints engines pulled and detailed , underside sprayed black etc. Things that you would think any half way intelligent car person would understand and see. the owners were clueless.  This happens frequently at the differnt Mustang/Shelby venues no matter how visible and available you make the criteria. So no matter what criteria you set ,it seems that someone will always have their own different interpretation of the definition it seems.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Mike_B_SVT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2013, 05:42:10 PM »
That's what I am thinking. unrestored original retaining most, if not all, the original equipment, even the paint,  minus hoses, belts, tires, battery, etc....the preventive maintenance stuff.

Personally, I agree with the above on what I consider a survivor car.

IMO, you have to ask "what did it survive?" to earn the name "survivor"?  A car that has always been treated like a collectible and stored away with little or no use can hardly be said to have even lived the life of a car, let alone "survived" it.

I see a "survivor car" as a car that has been used like a car, but cared for as a cherished object.  It shows signs of use without being "used up".
It has been maintained properly, and repaired with correct OEM parts when possible (darn obsolete parts!).  It may have been spot painted if it was in a minor fender bender, but has not had a complete repaint.  It isn't rusted, because it has been cleaned and maintained, and stored properly when possible.  It does not require restoration.

*huh... first post, but long time lurker.  I thought I would have posted before now, LOL!
« Last Edit: December 06, 2013, 06:25:52 PM by Mike_B_SVT »
Mike B.

2003 Mustang Cobra Convertible
1 of 354 in Sonic Blue

1970 Cougar Eliminator (Competition Gold / Black Decor Interior), 428SCJ, Ram-Air, 4-speed w/ Hurst shifter
Built: Dearborn, Oct 6th, 1969
Cat Bites Man!

priceless

  • Guest
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2013, 10:05:32 AM »
Welcome Mike. Good observations. And it makes sense. 

Offline ptosborn1111

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2014, 04:37:43 PM »
Does this mean that my 71' Boss 351 with 32000 original miles, original interior (except the radio and speakers), original drive train (minus original distributor, carb and ignition), 1 paint job, and was bought from original owner.... in all of your opinions could be a survivor? I have been around the block on this issue 100 + times and even the guy I bought the car from (he is mostly a Shelby restorer, and some bosses plus countless others) says it is a survivor. When I talk to a lot of guys, I most disappointingly get  the feeling that I was placed in the mislead category. I guess my vision of "SURVIVIOR" is a car that may have been through a few owners but has never been touched; mechanically, body, suspension, interior, no matter how many miles. Is that asking for too much?
65' Fastback (42k mile car) VIN 5F09A718971
A code 289/4 speed
Body 63A
Color K
Trim 26
Date 07S
DSO 41

71' Boss 351 (Grabber yellow, 2nd owner, 32k miles)
71' Boss 351 (Bright red, 2nd owner, 56k miles)
67' RS/SS 350 Camaro (Butternut yellow project)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24597
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2014, 05:43:02 PM »
Does this mean that my 71' Boss 351 with 32000 original miles, original interior (except the radio and speakers), original drive train (minus original distributor, carb and ignition), 1 paint job,...................

I don't use the term  - so it makes the answer easy ;)

With your description to me it's a "tweener"  - see one of the other threads :)   Just me
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9331
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2014, 06:22:53 PM »
Does this mean that my 71' Boss 351 with 32000 original miles, original interior (except the radio and speakers), original drive train (minus original distributor, carb and ignition), 1 paint job, and was bought from original owner.... in all of your opinions could be a survivor? I have been around the block on this issue 100 + times and even the guy I bought the car from (he is mostly a Shelby restorer, and some bosses plus countless others) says it is a survivor. When I talk to a lot of guys, I most disappointingly get  the feeling that I was placed in the mislead category. I guess my vision of "SURVIVIOR" is a car that may have been through a few owners but has never been touched; mechanically, body, suspension, interior, no matter how many miles. Is that asking for too much?
By YOUR own definition it does not qualify as a survivor based on the discription you gave so I am not sure how you were mislead? I am with Jeff it sounds like a Tweener (inbetween).
« Last Edit: January 09, 2014, 06:25:20 PM by Bob Gaines »
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline workhorse

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2014, 09:44:15 AM »
Clearly the term is subjective. Should there be the occassion where one of these cars, a "tweener" not quite a "survivor" by someones definition arrives at an MCA show, what class do the fall into?

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24597
Re: A good definition of a "Survivor" car.
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2014, 12:20:14 PM »
Clearly the term is subjective. Should there be the occassion where one of these cars, a "tweener" not quite a "survivor" by someones definition arrives at an MCA show, what class do the fall into?

Its always up to the  owner what class a car is entered in - at least at MCA and SAAC based on my experience. The woner looks at the opinions and chooses either on what award they which to try for, what kind of feedback they looking for or one where they have the greatest possibility (in their opinion) of the highest award.

MCA offers allot of classes but they can only carve out a limited number of possibilities just like any other organization. Currently there is no class just for the cars that aren't unrestored, are not restored and or are not daily drivers. OF course winning a $20 trophy is not everyone's goal and those owners just want to display their car and enjoy the day. But there is an effort to make a class  for the "tweeners" - you'll find a discussion about that in the MCA Judging area of this site


http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=7286.0
« Last Edit: January 10, 2014, 11:47:16 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)