Often the sealer application can get confused with the sound deadener - especially in the years and applications where the spray sealant (with no brush over) was used.
Mid year 67 (approx 156xxx-164xxx) San Jose plant examples (Note- owners with cars from other periods and plants PLEASE do not copy these examples
The challenge is always that there is not one single answer and if every one copied one then we would end up with a bunch of cookie- cutter looking cars not truly representing how the cars were originally built so we'll need to accept that there was a range of possibilities and your choice (lacking specific historical evidence from your specific car) should fall into that range IMHO
Looking at examples from San Jose from November into Jan it was a period were workers were sealing the frame to inner fender panels, shock towers to frame and cowl/firewall section to the torque boxes, frame and inner fender panels seams with a thick application of sealer. In a couple of examples a worker forgot to apply at the shock tower to inner fender edge below the spring cover
Sound deadener was applied fairly lightly (when compared to other periods and plants) to the inner fender panels before and after the shock towers. Most of the time never up to the level (approx) of the spring covers or their mounting bolts
I've high lighted the areas covered since my larger and higher resolution pictures are a bit clearer than ones I can post here
The last picture showing the battery box area is from a slightly earlier period where the frame to inner seam was not applied as heavy but shows a typical small spot of sound deadener applied with is typical of much of 67 production for that area
BTW in the third picture you can make out a little of the sound deadener remains as a bridge between the surface and the plug - plug above the fuel line) at the 9 o'clock to 12 o'clock position
Hope this helps