Author Topic: '67 289 with C8AE block  (Read 3486 times)

Offline socalgt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
'67 289 with C8AE block
« on: July 22, 2013, 06:24:40 PM »
I'm aware of the use of 302 blocks in some late 289 cars......Could a '67 April built car have a C8AE...block be its' original engine?

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2013, 07:08:56 PM »
According to Bob Mannel's Mustang & Ford Small Block V8 1962-1969, a worthwhile purchase, page 7-4 paragraph 7A2 (b) ...A second Cleveland block with the casting number of C8OE-6015-A (c) appeared later in the production year - at least as early as May 1967. The C8OE-6015-A block was actually intended for the new 1968 302 v8, but Ford's Cleveland foundry began substituting the blocks into 289 engines late in 1967 production. These blocks were marked 302 in the lifter valley (d) and have been the subject of much debate over authenticity. However, a date code pre-dating the vehicle build date would confirm the block as correct.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2013, 09:46:25 PM »
It is not usual to see a 302 block used in the second half of the 68 production. I agree on checking the date code compared with the build date of the car.
Marty 

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2013, 12:31:28 AM »
..............Could a '67 April built car have a C8AE...block be its' original engine?

Don't think your going to find one   As mentioned take a look at the casting date (right next to the casting/engineering number you provided. Also (just for fun) look at the date on the drivers side front side of the block - on the little projection where the head attaches. Think that will provide all you need ;)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline dave6768

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2013, 10:10:39 PM »
It is not usual to see a 302 block used in the second half of the 68 production. I agree on checking the date code compared with the build date of the car.
Marty

Marty, I trust you meant 67.  My June 67 289 has a 302 block.
Dave

Offline socalgt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2015, 02:38:28 PM »
Thanks for the quick replies(and that was quick). 

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9360
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2015, 11:24:30 PM »
According to Bob Mannel's Mustang & Ford Small Block V8 1962-1969, a worthwhile purchase, page 7-4 paragraph 7A2 (b) ...A second Cleveland block with the casting number of C8OE-6015-A (c) appeared later in the production year - at least as early as May 1967. The C8OE-6015-A block was actually intended for the new 1968 302 v8, but Ford's Cleveland foundry began substituting the blocks into 289 engines late in 1967 production. These blocks were marked 302 in the lifter valley (d) and have been the subject of much debate over authenticity. However, a date code pre-dating the vehicle build date would confirm the block as correct.
i don't believe there has been a legitimate C8 marked 289 hipo engine found.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: '67 289 with C8AE block
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2015, 04:28:42 PM »
Don't think your going to find one   As mentioned take a look at the casting date (right next to the casting/engineering number you provided. Also (just for fun) look at the date on the drivers side front side of the block - on the little projection where the head attaches. Think that will provide all you need ;)
What Jeff is referring to is the assembly date metal stamped on the block. The picture shows where.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.