Author Topic: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67  (Read 3397 times)

Offline craig429

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« on: March 14, 2013, 02:28:08 AM »
For a 67 289 2bbl auto built in San Jose in April 67, what should the fuel line clamps be at the junction of the two lines near where your left foot would be?

How about the ones going to the fuel pump? Ones to the carb fuel filter?

Thank you,
Craig
1967 Mustang Sport Sprint Coupe 289 Auto, AC, PS, CA Smog, Built April 1967 in San Jose.  Unrestored, one family owned and in my possession since 1980.
1969 Mustang Mach1 390
1970 Mustang Mach 1 428SCJ Auto, PS, PDB, medium bright blue metallic with White Shaker, built Sept 12, 69 in Metuchen

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2013, 09:19:33 AM »
They should be phosphate spring clamps with rounded ears not square or crimp band clamps. The band clamps were used from the tank to the pump and the spring clamps were used at the carb.
Marty

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2013, 09:58:26 PM »
For the "late" style/version of the fuel line

« Last Edit: June 27, 2021, 08:23:41 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2013, 12:29:44 AM »
Jeff are you saying that they were all spring clamps or ones built around that April date?

Offline PerkinsRestoration

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2013, 12:47:30 AM »
I believe spring clamps 65-73 era were square ear type?

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2013, 01:12:09 AM »
I believe spring clamps 65-73 era were square ear type?

+1 Don't think the picture is clear enough to see clearly the ends of the clamps. Of course could post a few more ;)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline craig429

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2013, 07:56:06 PM »
Looks like I will need to change some clamps out, as I have the wrong ones at the torque box.

 This 67 still has the original fuel clamps at the tank, and they are the crimped style. So this mean Ford originally used different fuel clamps styles at different locations of the fuel line?

What clamps should it have on the fuel line under the hood? Crimped or band style?

I was under the impression all the band style clamps for the older Mustangs were the square tabs and they changed to the rounded tab style to help prevent cut flesh.
1967 Mustang Sport Sprint Coupe 289 Auto, AC, PS, CA Smog, Built April 1967 in San Jose.  Unrestored, one family owned and in my possession since 1980.
1969 Mustang Mach1 390
1970 Mustang Mach 1 428SCJ Auto, PS, PDB, medium bright blue metallic with White Shaker, built Sept 12, 69 in Metuchen

Offline craig429

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2013, 11:13:49 AM »
I want to make sure I get this correct.

What type of clamp should be at the pump?

What type of clamp at the carb?


Does anyone have a source for 5/16" square tab spring clamps for the torque box connection?
1967 Mustang Sport Sprint Coupe 289 Auto, AC, PS, CA Smog, Built April 1967 in San Jose.  Unrestored, one family owned and in my possession since 1980.
1969 Mustang Mach1 390
1970 Mustang Mach 1 428SCJ Auto, PS, PDB, medium bright blue metallic with White Shaker, built Sept 12, 69 in Metuchen

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2013, 11:22:31 PM »
Same both locations - spring band and dark ;)




Source - wrecking yard, donor cars. So will try and file the rounded versions down to square but if you look at them from the side the ends can appear (surprise you removed metal during the process) short ;)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline craig429

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2013, 09:20:53 PM »
Thank you for all your help. I found some originals to be shipped to me.

Should the fuel hose have "GAS" lettering on it?
1967 Mustang Sport Sprint Coupe 289 Auto, AC, PS, CA Smog, Built April 1967 in San Jose.  Unrestored, one family owned and in my possession since 1980.
1969 Mustang Mach1 390
1970 Mustang Mach 1 428SCJ Auto, PS, PDB, medium bright blue metallic with White Shaker, built Sept 12, 69 in Metuchen

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2021, 07:19:20 PM »
I swore I saw this answer somewhere but cannot find it.
What clamp style is used on the hard line side of the rubber fuel line where the steel line enters the engine compartment?

I assume from Jeff's comment that the fuel pump side of the rubber line would be the spring clamp.

Although my car is a 289K and a month earlier I would have thought that the type of clamps on the rubber line would be the same as in this thread.
[This line of thinking has gotten me in trouble before!]
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9360
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #11 on: June 27, 2021, 12:04:20 AM »
I swore I saw this answer somewhere but cannot find it.
What clamp style is used on the hard line side of the rubber fuel line where the steel line enters the engine compartment?

I assume from Jeff's comment that the fuel pump side of the rubber line would be the spring clamp.

Although my car is a 289K and a month earlier I would have thought that the type of clamps on the rubber line would be the same as in this thread.
[This line of thinking has gotten me in trouble before!]
5/16 spring clamp with square corners and olive drab in finish. AMK used to sell them although I am not sure if they are square or rounded corners. The rounded corners is the standard now for safety reasons.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #12 on: June 27, 2021, 01:59:58 PM »
 Thank you, Bob.
Interesting on the olive color!
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: fuel line clamps for San Jose April 67
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2021, 08:39:02 PM »
Just another picture of the location of the clamps discussed here. Fixed the old PhotoBucket link above





Here are some square/sharp ended clamps Bob described above. In 68 they changed to a zinc or cad finished and remained like that for a few years. Can also be found in red dye in later years also. One supplier markings have been found surely there were a couple. Ones shown have been found on back east built cars

Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • In the middle of project hell
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion