Author Topic: Parts Car Candidate- Parts Date Coding Discussion  (Read 3089 times)

Offline RichardM68

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Parts Car Candidate- Parts Date Coding Discussion
« on: August 24, 2024, 10:22:55 AM »
Hello,

I own 8F02J166xxx.  A lot has been replaced on the car with AM parts by the PO.  I'm trying to get back to date matching.  I found a car whose build date is one week from mine, but it's a Metuchen car.  So my question is, how close would date codes be between the two?  Mainly, I thinking about sheet metal, but also rear end, etc.

Thanks,
-Richard
« Last Edit: January 07, 2025, 08:12:08 PM by J_Speegle »
1968 Fastback J code.  My -exact- first car!  8F02J166xxx.

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2024, 11:31:05 AM »
You should check out date codes in the library section of this site. You will find your answers there and you will learn a lot along the way.

Good hunting. If you cannot find your answers, please ask again.

Offline RichardM68

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2024, 11:38:08 AM »
Hi.  Thanks for the tip.  I looked on the main page, and I don't see anything that says library or date codes.  Would you provide a link please?  It sounds exactly like what I need.

Thanks,
-Richard
1968 Fastback J code.  My -exact- first car!  8F02J166xxx.

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2024, 12:36:12 PM »
As long as you are a Member, you should be able to scroll down to the Heading "Library & Links - Articles, documents and links to assist the restorer - Members Only Viewing".

https://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?board=22.0

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline RichardM68

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2024, 02:22:34 PM »
Thanks Bob.  I scrolled so fast I just went right past the "Library" link.

The only thing I found that was relevant was the "Decoding Date Codes" PDF.  I've see this before and it's great info, but it doesn't tell me if a Metuchen car built the same week as mine is very likely to have the same date codes as my Dearborn car.  Am I not seeing a different article that you're thinking about?

What I would love to have, and I know this isn't practical, is a list of build dates, per assembly plant, that for each build date lists the range of date codes of each part.  With that data I could get a really good idea of the original date codes for my car.  I know I'll likely never be exact, but at least I can say that a preponderance of evidence suggests I have the correct date codes.

Thanks,
-Richard


1968 Fastback J code.  My -exact- first car!  8F02J166xxx.

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2024, 02:30:49 PM »
Just check the date codes on your car, then check the parts car and see if they are close.

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7395
Re: parts car candidate
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2024, 03:28:52 PM »
Just check the date codes on your car, then check the parts car and see if they are close.
But those codes should be before, not after, and get a Marti Report - https://www.martiauto.com/index.cfm3
In general, all body parts date codes should be at least a week before the actual vehicle build date (You get that from the Marti Report). One major exception is the engine. Its components will have their own build date before the engine's build date, which should be a week before the vehicle's.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24743
Re: Parts car candidate
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2024, 06:10:08 PM »
Interesting that you found a NJ car that was in good enough condition to be used or considered as a candidate

The only thing I found that was relevant was the "Decoding Date Codes" PDF.  I've see this before and it's great info, but it doesn't tell me if a Metuchen car built the same week as mine is very likely to have the same date codes as my Dearborn car.  Am I not seeing a different article that you're thinking about?

No they likely would not. Guess you pulled a Marti report on both or have copies of them. Just want you to be comparing apple- apples since the door tag date means little in these cases. Body panels and other parts were sent in lots or pallets so all or a potion of a day of stamping would be sent to one plant where one later in the week or weeks would be sent to a different plant. We see these patterns, of a dozen to two dozen same date stamped parts, show up in a fair tight group when you graph them out. Example I was able to "guess" the exact original date on a friends fender for his car this last week since there was a grouping of a dozen or two cars on record of having that date. This even without exact date build date (pre 67) for each car. Does not always work out this well but sometimes it does. If nothing else can get pretty close which for me is pretty remarkable given how old these cars are. Just need the data in the records

What I would love to have, and I know this isn't practical, is a list of build dates, per assembly plant, that for each build date lists the range of date codes of each part.  With that data I could get a really good idea of the original date codes for my car.  I know I'll likely never be exact, but at least I can say that a preponderance of evidence suggests I have the correct date codes.

Yes that would make things easy but that isn't, normally, how this endeavor works.  :)  Also what we have requires lots of data and unfortunately cars from certain plants did not fair that well over the years so we collect less data from those plants.

A list, as you mentioned would have to be constructed for each day of production.  Right now I use a spread sheet for these purposes as mentioned. As far as a list I've not even compiled a list of all the thousands of parts that had date codes that make up the unibody. Especially when you look at every body style and changes between the years in what made up the uni-body
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline RichardM68

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2024, 10:55:02 PM »
That's exactly what I needed to know.  Thanks Jeff.  I wasn't aware that the body panels were round-robin'd between the plants in that way.  That being said, yes, I agree that the dates likely wouldn't match, hence making this a poor choice for a parts car.

I don't know where the car lived most of its life, but from the description and pictures, it had enough original parts to make me consider buying it.  I'd replace the parts with AM parts, and restore the donor car.  I keep my eyes open for "F" cars with close VIN's,  The ad didn't list the VIN, but the seller included a picture of the Marti report, with the last 6 of the VIN redacted, but it listed the dates.  This is the closest I've found, but unfortunately it's a different assembly plant.

Yes, very impractical indeed.  But imagine a website where I enter my build date, and assembly plant, and it returns a list of date codes for every date stamped part.  I can dream! 

Thanks again,
-Richard
1968 Fastback J code.  My -exact- first car!  8F02J166xxx.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24743
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2024, 11:06:13 PM »
That's exactly what I needed to know.  Thanks Jeff.  I wasn't aware that the body panels were round-robin'd between the plants in that way.  That being said, yes, I agree that the dates likely wouldn't match, hence making this a poor choice for a parts car.


If you still have panels where the date codes are visible on your car you might at least try and check to see if those same panels on the donor car match as far as date codes go  or are very close.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Dragpack 70

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2025, 07:15:33 AM »
Just browsing this topic
So all sheet metal was stamped at one plant and shipped out to the difference factory's
So would the date codes be all over the place
So let say his car January'built how close would the dates be on the sheet metal or is it like engines where the date codes can be up to 3 months prior to build date of car

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24743
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2025, 06:34:09 PM »
Just browsing this topic
So all sheet metal was stamped at one plant and shipped out to the difference factory's

Yes each piece or almost every piece is stamped with a date code during the stamping process, cast parts are cast with some form of date code also most of the time. This process is carried out at dozens of different stamping and casting plants as well as sometimes contractors locations. Once finished they are shipped to the car assembly plants for use on building cars or shipped to a location that distributes the parts to dealerships for use in repairing or selling to the public or businesses like body shops


So would the date codes be all over the place

The location of the stamping/casting dates was pretty standardized since they often used ingots that dropped in a prepared holder that designated the date for that run of parts being made that day. When they remade the large dies they could and sometimes did relocate the location of these holders based on the design and choices made by the workers in charge of designing them


So let say his car January'built how close would the dates be on the sheet metal or is it like engines where the date codes can be up to 3 months prior to build date of car

There can often be oddities where dates are have a greater spread than others. Often IMO those larger spreads do not reflect random factors but are the results of things we don't know or are unaware of. Supply of material, transportation  or union issues at both Ford and suppliers plants.  As far as dates I believe there are ranges where currently few if any are going to question the date while at the same time I believe that commonly the dates are much tighter given the patterns we see after collecting the data.


Getting into the tall grass for those interested. If not shot reading here :) Hope this helped expain
May choose to cut and paste the description below into another thread on date coding for more eyes


Often it appears that if you can gather enough data you can sometimes identify shipments of stamped sheet metal sent to a specific car assembly plant and relate that to cars being assembled during a period or range.  Having the real completion date for the 67 and up cars helps a lot

To illustrate at one car plant the fastback passenger side trunk hinge support had dates of
- 12R5 C2  Also seen during this time period 12R4 C2 and 12R6 C2. IMO likely all shipped in the same shipment
   Decoded-  Dec 5th - for right hand side - Cleveland Stamping plant - second shift

- Take notice that all were stamped on the same shift so possibly they were collected and all loaded into the same shipment to the car plant.

- And we have found them on cars being completed from Dec 12 to Dec 21 and Jan 24th to Feb 2nd

- Prior to this period we find a group of fastbacks. Same hinge support with a stamping code of 5C3.  Since this is a different pattern it may suggest that a second panel stamper was used to produce more of these panels to fill the order for that specific car assembly plant and also take note that these panels were stamped on the third shift.  Because of that I would speculate that they were placed in another container or strapped to a different pallet and include in the shipment with the second shifts panels. Once at the car plant a group of panels from the second shift was used on the line then when those ran low the shipment produced by the third shift was moved forward and when those were close to being used the third batch - again panels from the second shift was used to build new Mustang fastbacks.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Dragpack 70

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2025, 05:09:23 AM »
Hi
Thanks for that
Was looking  at a friend's 70 mach 1 and my 70 mach1
His car was built 8 days before mine
Some of dates match each other
But a lot of his dates where 2 months before build and a lot of date my car where one month early or the same month as build date
I was wondering why such a big spread between 2 cars built 8 days apart
That why I asked if sheet metal dates was like the engine parts dates September heads October intake august block
A 3 month split
Cheers

Offline krelboyne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1228
    • West Coast Classic Cougars
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2025, 11:51:00 AM »
Hi
Thanks for that
Was looking  at a friend's 70 mach 1 and my 70 mach1
His car was built 8 days before mine
Some of dates match each other
But a lot of his dates where 2 months before build and a lot of date my car where one month early or the same month as build date
I was wondering why such a big spread between 2 cars built 8 days apart
That why I asked if sheet metal dates was like the engine parts dates September heads October intake august block
A 3 month split
Cheers

Same plant, same engine, same transmission?
Scott Behncke - Carcheaologist
West Coast Classic Cougars
503-463-1130
1968 GT/CS 302-4V San Jose 05B
1968 Cougar XR7 Dearborn 09A

Offline Dragpack 70

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Parts Car Candidate
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2025, 03:15:58 PM »
Hi
Yes same plant
Both 351 cars a m code and a h code