Author Topic: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible  (Read 1721 times)

Offline Indycanard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« on: May 05, 2011, 09:18:16 PM »
I'm installing an "original" A/C system to my April 65 SJ Conv. There are no dimples or a "knockout" on the metal firewall.  The original firewall pad (original to this car) has a vertical rectangular pre-punched hole on the pad.  My assumption is this rectangular part of the pad is removed, and the hole is drilled.  I have a new oblong rubber seal and retainer bracket for the hose pass thru. 

What is correct for my car? Two individual holes (if yes, what hole size?), a single oblong hole(if yes, what are the dimensions?).

Thanks,

Henry

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7696
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2011, 10:01:50 PM »
If you don't have the knock-out plug, then the car would have had 2 separate holes for the A/C lines, each with a grommet.  Look on the engine bay side of where the pull-out would be on the firewall pad.  IIRC, there may be dimples there.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline Indycanard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2011, 12:41:29 AM »
Well, I don't have dimples, nor do I have individual grommets. I either get two grommets, or make a cutout similar to what the knockout size is to use my oblong single grommet. Anyone have the knockout size? If I go with the individual holes, what size are they?

Thanks 

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7696
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2011, 11:13:40 AM »
Why would you do the knockout when you say your car clearly did not have it.  If you don't have it and want this installation to be correct, you should have two separate holes.  The grommets used are the same as the ones used at the radiator support.  I'm sure someone can provide pics of where the holes should be.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline Indycanard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2011, 03:39:34 AM »
Thanks for the sanity check Charles. I need to order the grommets for the radiator, so I'll just double the order.  I'm using (Classic Auto Air)  new A/C hoses (for 134a), so I hope they fit the grommets.  Can you tell me the hole size thru the firewall (obviously the same size I need to drill thru the radiator support)?  Where does the clutch wire pass thru the firewall?

Thanks,

Henry

Offline Chris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2011, 11:39:06 AM »
Here's the firewall panel for a 64 1/2 mustang. This was sent with some original A/C parts I purchased recently. You can see the hole placement relative to the other cutouts and the second picture shows the hole size to be approximately 1 1/4 inches circular.
 
64 1/2 Poppy Red Convertible, 260V8 auto, 19 June 64

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7696
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2011, 02:08:55 PM »
Here's the holes on a Feb '65 San Jose car:

Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24688
Re: A/C holes thru firewall in a April 65 SJ Convertible
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2024, 09:59:51 PM »
Since the earlier pictures linked to this thread were stored on outside locations they have since failed for one reason or another plus some were not from the production period and showed versions that did not apply to the OP's request I'm going to post some additional pictures to help out others who may be looking for the same information.

To confirm that the cars are from the same plant and about the same production period I'm posting shortened versions of the VINs

5R2055xx


5R2064xx


5R2141xx


Earlier production (will try and include those findings in the 65 San Jose Running Changes Thread) had different firewalls and in turn different features and AC line configuration.

Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)