Here is photos of a low mileage June built San Jose 68 Mustang I took tonight. You can see that what we would think is typical is not typical on alot of these fasteners. I especially have never seen camber bolts with red dye on them like in the photos here so not sure I would reproduce that on another car unless we have more examples from that time period.... or if that fails at least from any time period. Seems uncommon to me as I have not seen it on other cars.
20230625_204242 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
20230625_204551 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
20230625_204641 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
20230625_204705 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
20230625_204722 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
Thanks Marcus I appreciate it. Like I was telling Keith who posted the list of S-100 fasteners. I went by the manual and applied the red dye to all those fasteners as per my original photos. Just confirming that you are saying that perhaps red dye should not be applied to all those fasteners?
Unfortunately my car was semi restored when I got it, so I didn't see any red dye on any fasteners other than the rear fold down rear seat and front seat. Can you confirm any other fasteners that should get the red dye?
I would love to know so I can continue putting my car together and remove any dye that does not belong. If I go by your photos, then none of the engine bay/suspension/steering fasteners should have dye applied.
What would a judge think if he saw all the red dye, would there be deductions.
Just curious what the consensus is as I have not seen much conversation about it on the forum and most people I ask don't seem to know either.
FYI I saw a very low mile 1969 GT at MCACN and took a lot of photos and did notice red dye applied to some fasteners. Just not sure how much difference there was between 68 & 69 in regards to the safety dye on fasteners.