Author Topic: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)  (Read 1511 times)

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« on: February 14, 2023, 08:31:56 PM »
I searched but did not find - looking for correct factory finishes for:

1. Dip stick - exposed handle/loop end
2. Dip stick - length inside tube
3. Dip stick tube - all of my examples are painted black, just looking to confirm

I did look at some of the unrestored car pictures, but nothing stands out to me one way or the other.

If the dip stick exposed parts are plated, what do we do about the rubber seal to replace it?
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9358
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2023, 01:48:39 AM »
I searched but did not find - looking for correct factory finishes for:

1. Dip stick - exposed handle/loop end
2. Dip stick - length inside tube
3. Dip stick tube - all of my examples are painted black, just looking to confirm

I did look at some of the unrestored car pictures, but nothing stands out to me one way or the other.

If the dip stick exposed parts are plated, what do we do about the rubber seal to replace it?
I have only seen the tube black. I typically see the dipstick and thumb pull what looks like unpainted steel. Just my observations.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2023, 04:08:32 PM »
Agree that for 67 and a C4 only have seen black used.

As for the dipstick itself often the exposed section has rust of some form. Will look for some examples that don't have surface rust
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2023, 09:43:40 PM »
That lines up with the one on my car and from a donor car - black painted tube, bare steel (with rust) stick.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2023, 06:54:00 AM »
That lines up with the one on my car and from a donor car - black painted tube, bare steel (with rust) stick.

*likewise on my November '66 SJ car, excepting the rust. Mine has (had) no rust, just a bit of oxidation on the bare steel.

I used a fine Scotchbrite pad to clean up the oxidation that was present on the exposed dipstick end to help it closer match the portion of the dipstick that was protected from the elements better.

If you need a sample-tone of what it should look like, go pull a dipstick from any newer car that uses a flat style dipstick and look at it.
Yes. That is what the natural steel portions should look like.
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2023, 07:58:58 PM »
A few pictures from pretty decent examples (given the years of use).

Spanning 7R13xxxx-7R19xxxx

Please ignore the black zip tye  ::)








As a side note a few very nice 68 examples appear to have some sort of plating  though I think they are the same part number


And while we were on the subject and others will likely view this thread when it comes up in a search of "C4" details, here is a few shots showing what the end of the handle looks like.

Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2023, 08:19:40 PM »
Looks very familiar.  Thanks!
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2023, 08:27:48 PM »
To me there appears to be some light plating of some form

Example on the top one there is a spot at 6 o'clock that appears to have been rubbing on the edge of the base cap where that created some surface rust while the rest of the cap shows nothing. Not sure what the plating would be but it appears to be lightly applied and didn't hold up as well as some other plating on parts in the general area

Just an observation
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9358
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2023, 08:33:10 PM »
Other year automatic dipsticks I have observed had a zinc phosphate coating/finish on the top and finger pull. I strongly suspect that is what is used in this case.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2023, 09:24:23 AM »
Other year automatic dipsticks I have observed had a zinc phosphate coating/finish on the top and finger pull. I strongly suspect that is what is used in this case.

I would agree that zinc phosphate coating was used. It quickly deteriorated and rusted.

Offline Anghelrestorations

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1193
    • Anghel Restorations
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2023, 02:13:03 PM »
Adding photos here of the 12,000 mile unrestored 68 Mustang I have here.  Tubes are black.  You can see what this dipstick looks like and its been preserved really well.  I also have an original 1967 C6 transmission that unrestored here and the finish for that looks the same.  Looks natural.  Take a look. 

20230217_105915 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr

20230217_105923 by Marcus Anghel, on Flickr
Marcus Anghel
MCA National Gold Card Judge, 69-71 Mustang
SAAC National Head Judge, Boss Mustangs

www.anghelrestorations.com
www.facebook.com/anghelrestorations
www.instagram.com/anghelrestorations

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2023, 06:10:43 PM »
Adding photos here of the 12,000 mile unrestored 68 Mustang I have here.  Tubes are black.  You can see what this dipstick looks like and its been preserved really well.  I also have an original 1967 C6 transmission that unrestored here and the finish for that looks the same.  Looks natural.  Take a look. 

Wish we could get a handful and test the unexposed area under the seal to confirm one way or the other. To me that particular example looked like it was plated with something though it was a weak plating when I looked at it Just what I came away with when I've looked at it and in other pictures. Realize it is from a different year but the part should be standard between 67-68 unless Ford changed something in 68 and if we could document that.

 
For the discussion, if we look back and consider all of the parts that make up or cars there seems to be very few parts that were not treated in someway to hold up against the elements

Did come up with some NOS ones but as we know service replacements were often coated differently to hold up to the elements and time while waiting on the shelves. Think I do have an early blue and white labeled one that may reflect the finish of a period, not later time. Will find and post for the discussion.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2023, 06:13:46 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2023, 02:47:00 PM »
A few things to add to round this discussion out:

1. The service part number is C6OZ-7A020-A (to help with future search hits).  It is interesting that the MPC calls out "Nickel plate (on cap)". Refer to the attached picture.
2. The overall length is about 22-1/2"
3. The straight section riveted on to the top section is 15-15/16" long
4. FoMoCo is stamped onto the "cap" (finger pull)
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9358
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2023, 05:52:45 PM »
A few things to add to round this discussion out:

1. The service part number is C6OZ-7A020-A (to help with future search hits).  It is interesting that the MPC calls out "Nickel plate (on cap)". Refer to the attached picture.
2. The overall length is about 22-1/2"
3. The straight section riveted on to the top section is 15-15/16" long
4. FoMoCo is stamped onto the "cap" (finger pull)
Yes it is interesting that the MPC would call out "Nickel plate". Are you implying that it should be Nickel plated based on what the MPC has printed or just commenting that it was interesting because that doesn't seem to be the case?
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 1967 C4 dip stick tube finish(es)
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2023, 05:55:49 PM »
Wonder if they (Ford) was referring to the lower section of the dipstick since it often looks very silver as if it were bright zinc or something similar. In some cases it appears to be smoother finish than zinc when I've viewed these sections
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)