Author Topic: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat  (Read 4695 times)

Offline evantugby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« on: July 28, 2020, 10:12:57 PM »
Gents,
I need help deciding on shooting my kar with a single stage or a base/clear coat.  It is my understanding that in 1966 these kars received a laquer single stage paint.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.  What are the pros and cons of each type of paint application?  Also what would you do for your restored kar? 

Thanks!
1966 GT, 6T09K13, Born 23 Oct 1965

There is no statue of equality in liberty harbor, there is a statue of liberty.  We are different this way.  -CK

Offline midlife

  • Wiring Guru---let me check your shorts!
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2174
    • Midlife Harness Restorations
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2020, 10:27:35 PM »
I believe the single stage paint type back then was enamel, not lacquer.
Midlife Harness Restorations - http://midlifeharness.com

Offline evantugby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2020, 10:37:24 PM »
I believe the single stage paint type back then was enamel, not lacquer.

Or was it urethane? 
1966 GT, 6T09K13, Born 23 Oct 1965

There is no statue of equality in liberty harbor, there is a statue of liberty.  We are different this way.  -CK

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9358
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2020, 10:58:46 PM »
I believe the single stage paint type back then was enamel, not lacquer.
+1. Ford used enamel . Repair shops of the time commonly used lacquer and so did other car manufacturers.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2020, 11:18:32 PM »
Actually, it was Acrylic Enamel, thus Ford's "AE" paint designation.

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2020, 11:27:28 PM »
Attached is Ford's "Official" Color Chart for 1966.

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline evantugby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2020, 11:35:08 PM »
Gents,
All great information but for restoration, should I use acrylic enamel or urethane? 
1966 GT, 6T09K13, Born 23 Oct 1965

There is no statue of equality in liberty harbor, there is a statue of liberty.  We are different this way.  -CK

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2020, 12:40:09 AM »
It’s a choice you have to make. Base coat / clear coat looks fantastic and lasts a long time. Single stage acrylic enamel is authentic but does not look as good or last as long. Acrylic paint is much less expensive.
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7687
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2020, 01:18:11 AM »
Single stage urethane is a common choice.  It can be sprayed with proper orange peel texture.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline woolshire

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2020, 02:07:06 PM »
Here’s what I think is a great choice. Obviously, this was made for touch-up in a rattle can, but it’s single stage Acrylic Enamel with Hardener. (PPG MAE). Makes blending easy. My car was repainted once, in 2002, and the paint is spectacular. Good luck!

Offline evantugby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2020, 03:59:19 PM »
Single stage urethane is a common choice.  It can be sprayed with proper orange peel texture.

Thanks Charlies and everyone!

Here is what I decide:  I want to do a single stage urethane paint.  Originally the paint was a single stage paint but was not wet sanded or buffed. It had a orange peel to a minor degree.  Because I’m trying to do a concourse correct car I do want to sort of replicate that slight orange peel in the original finish.  Base coat / clear coat, for me, is a no go.  I want to avoid the look that a basecoat clearcoat can provide which is a fake plastic, overly glossy appearance. A glass finish is not original in appearance for my 66 kar.  In addition, the single stage has an advantage in the trunk interior and other areas. With a single stage you can do as the factory did and simply mist the paint lightly over the primer like the painter was in a bit of a hurry.

Thank you for talking me through some of this decision-making process.  I'll post pictures soon.   
1966 GT, 6T09K13, Born 23 Oct 1965

There is no statue of equality in liberty harbor, there is a statue of liberty.  We are different this way.  -CK

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2020, 05:37:07 PM »
It's a choice you have to make. Base coat / clear coat looks fantastic and lasts a long time. Single stage acrylic enamel is authentic but does not look as good or last as long. Acrylic paint is much less expensive.

I've had the opposite experience. Single (not cut and buffed have lasted for decades where base coat/clear last about 5-7 years. Both factory and resprays. Have two base clear painted cars currently with 10-60% of the clear coat gone (peeling or turning to dust) while the single stage just chalks. Really hate BC/CC though keeping one inside covered all the time helps allot but often its applied so thick (so it can be cut and buffed) can lead to the "dipped in plastic" look IMHO
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2020, 07:03:26 PM »
Sorry that you had that experience. My own experience has been the opposite - my green GT-E for example was painted in 1994 (I finished the restoration in 1995) and still looks excellent as far as the paint goes. The paint was DuPont 2000 series basecoat / clearcoat in Augusta Green with Sheffield Silver lower body. The green color is the same as Highland Green in a Ford product. Yes it is much shinier than stock but here I am many years later with a paint job that looks fantastic still.

I need to re - restore the undercarriage and engine compartment. 30,000 miles driving and several seasons of Pure Stock drag racing takes its toll. And I know more now especially due to things found on this website.

I've had the opposite experience. Single (not cut and buffed have lasted for decades where base coat/clear last about 5-7 years. Both factory and resprays. Have two base clear painted cars currently with 10-60% of the clear coat gone (peeling or turning to dust) while the single stage just chalks. Really hate BC/CC though keeping one inside covered all the time helps allot but often its applied so thick (so it can be cut and buffed) can lead to the "dipped in plastic" look IMHO
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline rrenz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #13 on: August 04, 2020, 09:29:07 PM »
I paint for a living so ill give my two cents. if your going single stage go with a full urethane. that will be the most durable and expensive. Acrylic urethanes are on the cheaper side but you may sacrifice some durability. when I say durability its going to be against UV Rays from the sun.lastly with single stage you'll have a more authentic appearance. With BC/CC you'll have great durability and is easily repaired. while you can do a blend to urethane its tricky and takes some talent. if a door were to get damaged with BC/CC it could easily be blended in and then the whole panel re cleared. but in the end its ultimately your decision. Not everyone has such a keen eye for paint so it depends on how picky you want to be with authenticity. my 66 is single stage and it looks the part so I'm happy with it.
Ryan
1966 C Code NJ Springtime Yellow
C-4 Automatic
Build Date Jan 21st
2001 3.8 Mustang Convertible
2004 40th Anniversary

Offline evantugby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Single Stage vs Base/Clear coat
« Reply #14 on: August 07, 2020, 07:15:56 AM »
Gents,Last minute I decided to switch to BC/CC for repair-ability purposes.  I didn’t want that shiny clear coat look either so I did a matte finish.  Have a look!   
1966 GT, 6T09K13, Born 23 Oct 1965

There is no statue of equality in liberty harbor, there is a statue of liberty.  We are different this way.  -CK