Author Topic: Crankshaft Dampener Question  (Read 1396 times)

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Crankshaft Dampener Question
« on: July 19, 2020, 07:49:30 PM »
I'm rebuilding a 1964 1/2, 260 2V with a C4 automatic transmission. The dampener is needing to be replaced and I can't seem to find a crank dampener (Harmonic balancer) for a 260, only 289s. If the rods and crank are the same between the 260 & 289, are the 28 Oz. 260 and 289 dampeners interchangeable (besides the 3 or 4 bolt difference)? Will the timing marks be in the same place on both balancers?
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 10:43:43 PM by J_Speegle »

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2411
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2020, 08:27:40 PM »
why not rebuild yours? you know it fits.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 10:44:08 PM by J_Speegle »
5F09C331248

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: CRANKSHAFT DAMPENER QUESTION
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2020, 08:52:23 PM »
I was trying to keep the question as simple as possible but, I don't have the old one.

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2020, 09:09:54 PM »
Just in case you don't have the MPC.  First pic is the 68 version, second is 1972
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 10:43:59 PM by J_Speegle »
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2411
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2020, 09:33:26 PM »
I was trying to keep the question as simple as possible but, I don't have the old one.

you did not tell us that fact in the original post. do a search here for rebuilders. they also sell outright. btw please turn off the caps in the post titles.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 10:43:50 PM by J_Speegle »
5F09C331248

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2020, 10:44:50 PM »
why not rebuild yours? you know it fits.

And they are dated to your car if the engine is original


Took care of the CAPS :)
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2020, 10:50:26 PM »
Sorry about the caps thing.  So, I guess the real question here now is how can I find a C40E A1 crank damper?

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2020, 10:53:16 PM »
Sorry about the caps thing.  So, I guess the real question here now is how can I find a C40E A1 crank damper?

Guess I would start with Ebay, the Falcon and Fairlane sites and related business's that cover that year. "A bigger and wider net catches more fish"
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2020, 10:58:42 PM »
So, back to my original question.  I have an aftermarket one for now but, it is for a 289.  Are they interchangeable?  Are the timing marks the same so I can time and tune the engine?  I will start the hunt for an original but am wanting to tune the engine before I put the front clip back on the car.

Offline krelboyne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
    • West Coast Classic Cougars
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2020, 07:19:21 PM »
According to Mannel's book. C4OE-A1 (C4OE-6316-A) Should be for 1964 260 engines.
Scott Behncke - Carcheaologist
West Coast Classic Cougars
503-463-1130
1968 GT/CS 302-4V San Jose 05B
1968 Cougar XR7 Dearborn 09A

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2020, 08:17:45 PM »
Click here:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-1963-64-65-Ford-260-289-V8-Original-Mustang-Falcon-Comet-Harmonic-Balancer/223478174986?hash=item340856550a:g:EoYAAOSwdQda-MSp

I'm rebuilding a 1964 1/2, 260 2V with a C4 automatic transmission. The dampener is needing to be replaced and I can't seem to find a crank dampener (Harmonic balancer) for a 260, only 289s. If the rods and crank are the same between the 260 & 289, are the 28 Oz. 260 and 289 dampeners interchangeable (besides the 3 or 4 bolt difference)? Will the timing marks be in the same place on both balancers?
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2020, 09:25:34 PM »
So, to answer my own question.  I got the car timed and was thinking, if the cranks and rods are the same across the 260/289, then, TDC is TDC no matter which engine.  So this tells me the dampers are the same. 

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2020, 11:56:28 PM »
Well yes and no. The correct balancer is specific to the ‘65 260. Any balancer from a 64- 69 289 or 302 will fit and work.

 
So, to answer my own question.  I got the car timed and was thinking, if the cranks and rods are the same across the 260/289, then, TDC is TDC no matter which engine.  So this tells me the dampers are the same.
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline jackhodges

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #13 on: July 25, 2020, 01:52:08 AM »
Other than part number?

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Crankshaft Dampener Question
« Reply #14 on: July 25, 2020, 07:18:14 AM »
The balancers used on the various 260, 289 and 302 applications from 1964 - 69 all share the same pulley mounting capabilities and imbalance properties. Visually they differ greatly. Some are heavier and some are lighter. There is only one correct balancer for your application but there are many that will function just fine. There are many reproductions that would work so long as you don't care about authenticity.

Other than part number?
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock