Author Topic: Lower Control Arms: Natural or Painted Black?  (Read 1812 times)

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Lower Control Arms: Natural or Painted Black?
« on: December 21, 2010, 07:22:49 PM »
I've got a '69 Mach 1 that was built on June 5th, 1969, at the Metuchen plant.  The original lower control arms were long gone before I got the car.  The MCA rules state that original control arms could've been left entirely natural, or could've been painted black with the ball joint end left natural.  Is there any way of knowing which ones my car had originally?

Also, did all '69s receive natural upper control arms, or was there some variation there as well?

Thanks!
Too much junk, too little time.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: Lower Control Arms: Natural or Painted Black?
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2010, 11:32:00 PM »
I've never seen an original lower that was not dipped (inner end) in semi-gloss black - other than being completely rusty ;)

The last 69 NJ car I looked at with original suspension had them dipped also

Now the uppers are described in the rules as being natural (not dipped) and I believe that is widely supported and the current belief by the vast majority of the restoring and showing community for 69 Mustangs and Shelbys
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9360
Re: Lower Control Arms: Natural or Painted Black?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2010, 12:43:13 AM »
The only non dipped lowers I have ever seen were service units. Bob
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: Lower Control Arms: Natural or Painted Black?
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2010, 08:47:51 AM »
Thank you--that's exactly what I needed to hear!
Too much junk, too little time.