Author Topic: Radiator Hoses  (Read 1261 times)

Offline Brian Conway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1623
Radiator Hoses
« on: March 01, 2020, 07:50:12 PM »
I replaced these hoses on my 69 428 car about 10 years ago.  Anyway to tell if they could be the originals or service replacements ?  The Autolite ID's match current Marti replacements and each has an imprinted code, in the rubber, as well.  Upper hose Autolite C8ZE-8B274-E imprinted w/AU 209 12 C.  Lower hose Autolite C9ZE-8B273-D imprinted w/AU 221 12 C.   Thanks, Brian
5RO9A GT  4 Spd Built 5/29/65
9TO2R SCJ 4 Spd Built 9/19/68
Owner Driver Mechanic
San Diego, Ca.

Offline specialed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2020, 12:05:21 AM »
marti hoses

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9366
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2020, 11:56:16 AM »
marti hoses
For those not aware the smooth surface no texture is a dead giveaway. Assemblymen hoses of the era had a distinct "alligator skin" type texture. It was what was considered a "undesirable effect" by the MFG's .Over the decades the hoses evolved to the smooth finish. Marti uses modern hoses as the base for restamping. I think the texture started the change to smoother in the 70's. Ed would know the time frame better.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Brian Conway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1623
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2020, 12:29:08 PM »
OK. Good information.  So the ' alligator skin ' textured upper hose would be more correct for my 69.  Couple more questions; 1. Should the lower hose, C9ZE-D, be alligator/textured as well ?  The upper hose is id'ed as C8ZE-E, the older hose, and  newer Marti hose as C8WE-A ?  2. Do I assume as time progress's Marti info gets more accurate and the C8WE-A is more correct ?  Thanks, Brian
5RO9A GT  4 Spd Built 5/29/65
9TO2R SCJ 4 Spd Built 9/19/68
Owner Driver Mechanic
San Diego, Ca.

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9366
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2020, 12:41:55 PM »
OK. Good information.  So the ' alligator skin ' textured upper hose would be more correct for my 69.  Couple more questions; 1. Should the lower hose, C9ZE-D, be alligator/textured as well ?  The upper hose is id'ed as C8ZE-E, the older hose, and  newer Marti hose as C8WE-A ?  2. Do I assume as time progress's Marti info gets more accurate and the C8WE-A is more correct ?  Thanks, Brian
All of the assemblyline radiator hose on 65-70 Shelby's /Mustangs had the heavy texture. I will defer to Spec Ed on the appropriateness of the different engineering numbers as it relates to your application.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2020, 05:15:35 PM »
And a couple of pictures to illustrate and round out the responses :)

71 upper and 67 lower picture



Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline rockhouse66

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 947
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2020, 09:06:41 PM »
I understood the C9W hose to be correct.  Maybe Ed will confirm.
Jim
'66 GT FB

Offline Brian Conway

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1623
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2020, 06:24:16 PM »
Jim would you clarify C9W ?  Could you mean C8W ?  Brian
5RO9A GT  4 Spd Built 5/29/65
9TO2R SCJ 4 Spd Built 9/19/68
Owner Driver Mechanic
San Diego, Ca.

Offline specialed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2020, 10:01:30 PM »
Fomoco c8we upper assembly line

Offline rockhouse66

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 947
Re: Radiator Hoses
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2020, 09:22:52 AM »
Jim would you clarify C9W ?  Could you mean C8W ?  Brian

Brian - sorry.  See Ed's correction.  I defer!
Jim
'66 GT FB