Author Topic: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification  (Read 3900 times)

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« on: February 10, 2020, 02:01:21 PM »
Osborn's 67 Chassis manual, page 42, top and center lists hardware for "View Z FOR G.T." (also see VIEW Z & V, at lower rh corner of page).

"FOR G.T." (aka: "FOR POP OPEN CAP") shows a need of 4 screws number 52064-S8 but does not give specs for the nut.
A bit of discovery about this nut...

It appears it is the same nut used on the STANDARD Gas Cap, that nut is 380331-S8

I have pictures of the nut I removed from my example as well as a Service Replacement-provided nut that came with a NOS C8 gas cap.

I also discovered that the screws off my fuel cap when I disassembled my car were CHROMED, not dark zinc (52064-S8)

Anybody else have info on this hardware outside the spreadsheets and Assembly Manuals?

I have been asked by a fellow member privately about these. He has found the 380331-S8 locking nut in an MPC that says it was used 65 through 70.

Richard
« Last Edit: February 10, 2020, 06:18:35 PM by 67gtasanjose »
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2020, 05:44:18 PM »
My observations over the years matches what you have described as the original version. The service nut is very different from the ones I've taken off of original cars.

Sorry don't have any clear pictures in my collection that I could find - tight spaces and not a clear shot from the top/face of the nut when installed on a car. Even the couple of examples (yes when through all the pictures to be sure) didn't show enough detail to post
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2020, 06:23:07 PM »
My observations over the years matches what you have described as the original version. The service nut is very different from the ones I've taken off of original cars.

Sorry don't have any clear pictures in my collection that I could find - tight spaces and not a clear shot from the top/face of the nut when installed on a car. Even the couple of examples (yes when through all the pictures to be sure) didn't show enough detail to post

Thanks Jeff. I plan to use what I removed from my example. The chromed finish screws seemed odd too, though they are otherwise "as described" in Jim's spreadsheets.
Jim and I have chatted a bit about the chromed finish not being correct. I will be putting back what I took out but others may find theirs are all S8 finish, I am OK with that.

BTW, I added to the first post, some clean images of the gas cap mounting nut I removed, images without all of my scribbling.
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2020, 06:44:40 PM »
Richard, I have an NOS service part that looks exactly like yours.  The used one I have does not appear to have any locking function.  The four mounting screws don't appear to have been chrome plated.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2020, 06:47:29 PM »


Think the four depressions in the  nut may work or deform the threads enough to have originally created some deformity and in turn a locking affect. Once removed allot of that would go away =. Just a possibility


Thought I could at least post a couple of pictures since I took the time to search.  Might help a little


7R1721xx




7R1977xx


Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2020, 09:02:10 PM »
I cleaned mine a few months back and they, too, cleaned up really shiny -- just like chrome.
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2020, 06:32:08 AM »
My friend from "Down Under" has provided a page from the MPC he has been viewing to determine that the 380331-S8 locking nut is used across multiple years and types of fuel caps.

I noticed also a reference to "CHROME RETAINER" (not "chrome retainerS") but they are noted as being shown to be used with the 69 & 70 service parts.

I cleaned mine a few months back and they, too, cleaned up really shiny -- just like chrome.

Besides Bill's findings on his example, it is always a possibility that Service Replacements could be a source of the "CHROMED retainer"S.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2020, 08:50:03 AM by 67gtasanjose »
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2020, 11:28:30 AM »
Richard : Just FYI, both the 1967 Only, and the 1960-68 MPC's (both closer to the actual time period than the 1965-72 MPC (printed in 1975), show the same 380331--S7/8 lock nut.

However, in looking at the 1966, 1969 and 1975 Ford Standard and Utility Parts Catalogs, that part is actually the "indented type" (aka "Center-Lok") type as shown in John's picture of his used one, not the "Flex-Lok" type which came on both yours and his NOS Service Parts.

I have yet to find a listing in the MPC's for the 4 retainer screws. Interestingly, the 52064-S is only listed in AMK's book, not in any of the Standard and Utility Parts Books.

Bob
« Last Edit: July 10, 2021, 10:01:47 PM by 196667Bob »
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2020, 01:09:12 PM »
Richard : Just FYI, both the 1967 Only, and the 1960-68 MPC's (both closer to the actual time period than the 1965-72 MPC (printed in 1975), show the same 38033--S7/8 lock nut.

However, in looking at the 1966, 1969 and 1975 Ford Standard and Utility Parts Catalogs, that part is actually the "indented type" (aka "Center-Lok") type as shown in John's picture of his used one, not the "Flex-Lok" type which came on both yours and his NOS Service Parts.

I have yet to find a listing in the MPC's for the 4 retainer screws. Interestingly, the 52064-S is only listed in AMK's book, not in any of the Standard and Utility Parts Books.

Bob

Thanks Bob.
I thought I would point out that I DO HAVE the correct nut pictured above in my first post. I have it held in my fingers. Yes. There is ALSO one of the Service Replacement type pictured that is attached to the fuel cap with a flat washer and a flat rubber washer.
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2020, 01:20:51 PM »
I think that it is interesting that Ford went to the Flex-Lok nut on the Service Parts, since the Center-Lok ones were still available until at least 1975. My guess is because the Center-Lok nuts are "one and done" (not reusable), while the Flex-Loks can be re-used.

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2021, 08:58:37 AM »
Another thread (in another year Mustang index) discussing the same retaining nut.
It would appear that the same nut is most likely used on ALL vintage Mustang gas caps, whether or not it is the pop-open type or the standard "cable secured" type.

https://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=25047.0
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2021, 01:06:47 PM »
From what I see in the Mustang Chassis Assembly Manuals (64- 65, 67, 68, 69 and 70), it's one nut per installation, non-pop open gas caps. The other four retainers are screws. In 1970, the finish changed to phosphate and oil. On the several I've had (from salvaged cars), most had a red sealer. I kept one red realer as a sample. I assume the sealer applied to all years.
I can't answer for service or aftermarket replacements.
Jim
« Last Edit: July 08, 2021, 01:13:21 PM by jwc66k »
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7687
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2021, 01:18:04 PM »
So are we saying the spin nut with red sealer should be used on cars with pop open gas cap?  Would like to see a few more examples if that's the case, across assembly plants.

Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2021, 05:45:52 PM »
So are we saying the spin nut with red sealer should be used on cars with pop open gas cap?  Would like to see a few more examples if that's the case, across assembly plants.
It is at least a good rumor, we should look at multiple examples from all plants & year models before assuming it as actual FACT. Evidence does seem strong so far (with at least 4 examples).
« Last Edit: July 09, 2021, 08:56:12 AM by 67gtasanjose »
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: 67 (& 68?)Pop-open Style Fuel Cap Hardware Clarification
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2021, 12:16:38 AM »
So are we saying the spin nut with red sealer should be used on cars with pop open gas cap? 
I said -
- non-pop open gas caps.
What are you reading?
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.