Thanks everyone for responding. When I posted my question, I counted the months wrong and thought 4H25 was September 25, 1964 instead of August, so my statement on the engine components was also off a month. The 4H25 date comes a photo of the assembly date stamp by the distributor. Most of the engine components are H or late G parts so appear to align with the engine assembly date. The VIN is 625xxx and should be close to the Feb 10 1965 scheduled date on the data plate, but not absolutely sure. It was built at the Dearborn plant and delivered to a Detroit DSO. So, not being able to see the mains or the casting number behind the starter yet, I have no comfort this is is the original engine (mostly due to the 6 month period between car build and engine assembly date). What confuses me is why fake a hipo by stamping the vin onto a block that is out of the sensible range.
Appreciate the help. My gut tells me not to travel to look further. As well, I would have expected the seller to have better documented explanation for the date difference. The good thing is that they’re not selling it as numbers matching, but posting photos of the block VIN and letting the buyer make a conclusion. I guess buyer be ware.
Thank you.