Author Topic: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification  (Read 1669 times)

Offline Deuce

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« on: December 08, 2019, 04:53:46 PM »
From discussions and information in this forum, we know that the 65-68 reproduction antennas on the market are styled after the 65/66 design, where the screwed-on ball affixed to the top/third mast section remains extended about 1 1/4" above the second mast section when the antenna is fully retracted.

Designed differently on the factory-orginal 67/68 antenna, the ball atop the third section collapses all the way down to the second section when the antenna is fully retracted, hiding completely the third mast section.

Shown in the below pics is the result of a recent project on my 67 coupe; i.e., cutting down and re-threading the third mast section so the top ball bottoms out against the second section when fullly retracted.  Given the availability of original or NOS 67/68 antennas, this is as close to the original configuration it's going to get for this car.  Original AM radio reception is acceptable and there is No rattle.

Btw, still have the C7 antenna base, cable and fittings that came with the car when new.  The press-on mast is missing; therefore the reproduction antenna is installed. 



« Last Edit: December 08, 2019, 04:56:24 PM by Deuce »
Deuce
1967 C-code Hardtop Coupe, C-4, AC, PS, T/E; SJ built Nov 30 1966, DSO 71___Unrestored
2008 Premium GT Coupe, 5-speed, rear spoiler delete, HID headlamps, well-optioned, built Oct 23 2007, RC 72

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2019, 06:27:16 PM »
Big improvement.
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Online ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3938
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2019, 11:37:22 PM »
Great idea. I like thinking like that, doing what it takes to make it correct. Seems to me it would be so simple for a manufacturer to do something like that. Their altitude most often is close is good enough.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2019, 09:20:23 AM by ruppstang »

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2019, 12:10:21 AM »
I like it!
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2019, 05:52:28 AM »
 8)
Nice work Robert.
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline 68Metuchen390GT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2019, 11:05:18 AM »
Thanks
1968 Mustang GT 390 Raven Black, 4 Speed
8T02S212765, Metuchen, June 19, 1968

Offline 67350#1242

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2019, 11:43:33 AM »
Are you saying that the ball on the repro antenna was threaded onto the mast?   I guess I assumed they were press fitted or glued.   Can you give more detail on how you went about the modification?
Thanks,  Kurt.
67 Coupe SJ 11/16/66
67 GT350 SJ 2/01/67

Offline Deuce

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2019, 10:33:21 PM »
Are you saying that the ball on the repro antenna was threaded onto the mast?   I guess I assumed they were press fitted or glued.   Can you give more detail on how you went about the modification?
Thanks,  Kurt.

Appreciate your comments!

Yes, the ball on the repro antenna is threaded on to the mast.

What follows below is correct for the repro Scott Drake antenna I ordered from NPD five years ago: https://www.npdlink.com/product/antenna-radio-round-base-repro-us-made/103158?backurl=search%2Fproducts%3Fsearch_terms%3Dantenna%26top_parent%3D200001%26year%3D1967&year=1967. (I don't know if there are other repro 65-68 antenna manufacturers).

- Mic'd the diameter of the third (smallest dia.) top mast section:  0.094"
- Researched the nearest thread spec for 0.094" diameter stainless steel rod: #3-56 UNF, or #3-48 UNC
- Selected two taps to determine which is correct thread size, by chasing the taps into the ball:
       -- 3-56 UNF tap threaded into the ball
       -- 3-48 UNC tap did not thread into ball
- Deduced the correct thread inside the ball is 3-56 UNF
- Cut length of third section rod down by about 1.25"
- Used 3-56 UNF die to rethread newly cut tip of top mast section
- Trimmed / adjusted the tip of the top mast section so the threaded-on ball would bottom out on the second section when mast is fully retracted
- Done!  Clean & Lubricate mast, turn radio on and drive.

The stainless steel rod is hard material.  Use a quality die (my #3-56 UNF die is fitted for 13/16" diestock handle), and liberal application of cutting oil.  Go slow.  My die cut the new threads nicely using plenty of cutting oil.

Happy to take any questions.
 





« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 12:24:27 AM by Deuce »
Deuce
1967 C-code Hardtop Coupe, C-4, AC, PS, T/E; SJ built Nov 30 1966, DSO 71___Unrestored
2008 Premium GT Coupe, 5-speed, rear spoiler delete, HID headlamps, well-optioned, built Oct 23 2007, RC 72

Offline 67350#1242

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2019, 12:33:39 AM »
Thanks for your excellent how to proceed rundown.
67 Coupe SJ 11/16/66
67 GT350 SJ 2/01/67

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2019, 10:44:30 AM »
What is the diameter of the ball on the Scott Drake reproduction antenna? I have OEM antennas on both of my cars. What I notice at car shows is that the reproduction antennas have smaller balls on the end, and that unlike the originals, the reproduction balls are stainless steel while the originals appear to be chrome plated.
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline Hipo giddyup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There is no end to doing right. Giddyup!!!
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2019, 10:58:15 AM »
Can you explain what you used/how to hold the mast when removing and then when rethreading?

Thx
1967 Springtime Yellow Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Metuchen built, Nov. 17th 66'
1966 Sahara Beige Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, July 21st 66'
1964 1/2 Pagoda Green Coupe, 260 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, June 30th 64'
1966 GT350 Fastback clone, 289 HiPo, 725cfm Holley, 4spd, SanJose built, Nov 25th 65'

Offline Deuce

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2019, 11:20:13 AM »
What is the diameter of the ball on the Scott Drake reproduction antenna? I have OEM antennas on both of my cars. What I notice at car shows is that the reproduction antennas have smaller balls on the end, and that unlike the originals, the reproduction balls are stainless steel while the originals appear to be chrome plated.

The ball is mic'd at 0.309"

Non-magnetic, no corrosion, so assuming it's stainless steel material.  Could be brass I suppose, but internal threads don't have a yellow cast as brass would.

The diameter of the OEM antenna ball is ______ ?
Deuce
1967 C-code Hardtop Coupe, C-4, AC, PS, T/E; SJ built Nov 30 1966, DSO 71___Unrestored
2008 Premium GT Coupe, 5-speed, rear spoiler delete, HID headlamps, well-optioned, built Oct 23 2007, RC 72

Offline Deuce

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2019, 11:44:54 AM »
Can you explain what you used/how to hold the mast when removing and then when rethreading?

Thx

Thought about this and the various repair options (uninstall antenna, place in vice, etc.). Decided to do the work with antenna mounted on the car.  Covered the fender area around antenna base with blanket to protect the paint finish.

The stainless rod is hard material.  Ended up using vice grip pliers to hold the antenna rod stationary while using the die in the diestock handle.  Afterwards, there was not a mark or blemish in the rod from using the vice grip pliers - tough stuff!   (First tried using a cloth rag or rubber sheet to protect the rod material from the tightened plier jaws.  The rod would still spin with the pliers clamped very tight and the die in place, so this didn't get very far).

Another comment:  I used an industrial-strength bolt cutter designed to cut up to 6mm (~ 1/4") stock.  Sliced right through the rod. 

Finished job:


« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 12:16:49 PM by Deuce »
Deuce
1967 C-code Hardtop Coupe, C-4, AC, PS, T/E; SJ built Nov 30 1966, DSO 71___Unrestored
2008 Premium GT Coupe, 5-speed, rear spoiler delete, HID headlamps, well-optioned, built Oct 23 2007, RC 72

Offline RoyceP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1536
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2019, 01:13:11 PM »
It measures .303".



The ball is mic'd at 0.309"

Non-magnetic, no corrosion, so assuming it's stainless steel material.  Could be brass I suppose, but internal threads don't have a yellow cast as brass would.

The diameter of the OEM antenna ball is ______ ?
1968 W code 427 Cougar XR-7 GTE Feb 23 Dearborn C6 / 3.50 open
1968 R code 428CJ Cougar XR-7 May 13 Dearborn C6 / 3.91 T - Lock

Offline Deuce

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
Re: 1967 Reproduction Antenna Modification
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2019, 01:52:18 PM »
It measures .303".

Just a few thou (0.006") difference in diameter. 
Repro:  0.309"
OEM:    0.303"

The OEM ball might be a little bit shinier though, might have to polish mine.

Thanks,
Deuce
1967 C-code Hardtop Coupe, C-4, AC, PS, T/E; SJ built Nov 30 1966, DSO 71___Unrestored
2008 Premium GT Coupe, 5-speed, rear spoiler delete, HID headlamps, well-optioned, built Oct 23 2007, RC 72