A while back on a different forum, I had posted a pic of my Dearborn 66 Convertible's door data plate. Someone pointed out that the placement of the axle code stamp on the data plate was wrong and that the plate was likely a reproduction added to the car after it was a built, perhaps to reflect some changes made to the car.
Taking the expert's opinion to heart, I ordered a new reproduction plate from Marti Auto Works, one that would be more correctly stamped. When I received the Marti plate and compared it to the one I took off my car, something immediately jumped out that made me question the original diagnosis.
Here is a photo of the new Marti repro data plate (on top) and the one that was on my car when I bought it (on the bottom). You can clearly see that the Marti plate's Ford logos are different than the ones on my original plate. The tail of the bar through the middle of the "F" in Ford is much longer on the logos of my original plate.
So, I did some google image searching for some original door data tags, and these all seem to have "long tail" bars on the F's like my original plate, and unlike the Marti reproduction. Here are a few examples.
What are your thoughts? Is my original plate likely original but with a weird stamping 'error' (even though the axle code is actually centered better than on all the other original data plates.
Or is my original plate just a better reproduction of the original Ford data plate artwork, but still a reproduction?
Thanks in advance for your expert opinions.