« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?  (Read 909 times)

Offline RAH2 1964.5

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« on: September 24, 2018, 05:18:52 PM »
The frame of my 1964.5 Convertible has a cut-out per the pics attached. Is this correct? Is this for tire clearance?
Logged
Thanks Roger

05/08/64, Dearborn, Convert., DSO Phil.
Raven, Stand. Int., White with Black Trim
AT, 260v, PS, Console

2003 Cobra Convert., Torch Red, 10th Anniv., Stock

2006 GT Coupe, Redfire, Factory Stripes, Stock (Shaker Intake)

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2411
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2018, 05:20:54 PM »
yep. you have discovered another early car anomaly.....keep digging there are more.
Logged
5F09C331248

Offline RAH2 1964.5

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2018, 05:31:15 PM »
The tire still rubs. Working on that.
Logged
Thanks Roger

05/08/64, Dearborn, Convert., DSO Phil.
Raven, Stand. Int., White with Black Trim
AT, 260v, PS, Console

2003 Cobra Convert., Torch Red, 10th Anniv., Stock

2006 GT Coupe, Redfire, Factory Stripes, Stock (Shaker Intake)

Offline NEFaurora

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 970
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2018, 10:31:33 PM »
"yep. you have discovered another early car anomaly.....keep digging there are more."

It's not an "Early Car Anomaly".... My Late production '65 and my '66 both have the same identical "Cut-Outs"....

The "Cut-Outs" are for the Brakes hoses.....so that the Brake Hoses don't get crushed by the Tire against the Uni-Body Frame...

I believe that "Really Early" cars don't have the cut-outs.... Like Dearborn Mustang#1  VIN# 100001 ..... No Cut-outs on that car...

Others will chime in to comment...

:o)

Tony K.

« Last Edit: September 27, 2018, 10:42:29 PM by NEFaurora »
Logged
Tony Kovar (NEFaurora@aol.com)
1965 Mustang Convertible 200 cid 3spd manual
1966 Mustang Convertible Sprint 200 C4 Auto
2007 Mustang Convertible V6 Auto with "Pony Package".
1966 Mustang Sprint 200 Registry Owner/Moderator
MCA#70001

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2018, 11:17:59 PM »
Quote from: RAH2 1964.5 on September 24, 2018, 05:18:52 PM
The frame of my 1964.5 Convertible has a cut-out per the pics attached. Is this correct? .......

After looking at other examples a car in the 5F14xxxx period IMHO yes it's correct. And would be present on both sides

Earliest car I have (lowest VIN) with this detail that I have pictures of would be 5F100037
Logged
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline NEFaurora

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 970
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2018, 12:47:18 AM »

"Earliest car I have (lowest VIN) with this detail that I have pictures of would be 5F100037"

Great info.   I did'nt realize that they had even started that early with the "Cut-Outs"....even in Pre-Production.... It looks like someone realized the Possible issue real early!

Thanks,

:o)

Tony K.

Logged
Tony Kovar (NEFaurora@aol.com)
1965 Mustang Convertible 200 cid 3spd manual
1966 Mustang Convertible Sprint 200 C4 Auto
2007 Mustang Convertible V6 Auto with "Pony Package".
1966 Mustang Sprint 200 Registry Owner/Moderator
MCA#70001

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
Re: 1964.5 Frame Cut-Out for Tire? Is this correct?
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2018, 02:11:16 AM »
Quote from: NEFaurora on September 30, 2018, 12:47:18 AM
"Earliest car I have (lowest VIN) with this detail that I have pictures of would be 5F100037"

Great info.   I did'nt realize that they had even started that early with the "Cut-Outs"....even in Pre-Production.... It looks like someone realized the Possible issue real early!

I don't know about labeling 5F100037 as "pre-production" since they were producing the cars  ::)  I sort of save that term for the pilot plant cars :)  But that's what I found but would love to see others from the first couple of days of production to back up the finding as always
Logged
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »