Author Topic: 1967 Extra Cooling  (Read 1481 times)

Offline teslaman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
1967 Extra Cooling
« on: September 07, 2018, 03:25:12 PM »
Hey guys. I just got a Marti Report and discovered that my car was equipped with the extra cooling package. What would have been different on my engine because of this package compared to a car without it? Thanks.
1967 San Jose deluxe coupe. Wimbledon White, vinyl top.
289 2V with C4 trans. PB, PS, T/E.

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9240
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2018, 07:26:56 PM »
Hey guys. I just got a Marti Report and discovered that my car was equipped with the extra cooling package. What would have been different on my engine because of this package compared to a car without it? Thanks.
All I can think of is the radiator ,fan shroud, fan, fan clutch and associated hardware. If there is anything else hopefully others will catch it.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline teslaman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2018, 07:55:34 PM »
So there was a different "extra cooling" radiator? Did it have an extra row? I made a topic yesterday about the correct fan for my car. The consensus was that it should be the C6AE-8600-E fan but now that I know the car had X/C I'm completely unsure again. All I know is that since 1979 the car had no fan shroud and the C6AE-8600-E fan (no clutch) but this could have been easily changed since I know the car had the engine pulled by a shop around that time.
1967 San Jose deluxe coupe. Wimbledon White, vinyl top.
289 2V with C4 trans. PB, PS, T/E.

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7317
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2018, 12:20:52 AM »
So there was a different "extra cooling" radiator? Did it have an extra row?
I remember references to "fins per inch" as the difference, but same thickness.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2018, 04:29:20 AM »
While the "1967 Showroom Options" book notes under "Extra Cooling Package" that it includes "Larger Radiator (more fins per inch), a look at the 1967 MPC and the 1960-68 MPC both show that the same radiator (C7ZZ-8005-B, 20-1/4 x 16-3/8 x 1-1/4") was used for "Standard", "Extra Cooling" and "A/C" applications. Both MPC's also show that the fans used were a 4 blade, 17-1/2" diameter for "Standard" (exc Special, A/C or T/E) applications ; a 5 blade "fixed", 17" diameter fan for "Extra Cooling" (without A/C) ; and a 7 blade, 17-1/2" diameter clutch (viscous) fan for A/C. Also noted  is that the "Extra Cooling" package is "Standard with A/C".

According to the MPC's, it appears that the only difference between "Standard Cooling" and "Extra Cooling" is the Fan ?

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3073
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2018, 06:39:49 AM »
Bob, I'm wondering if Ford from the start was limiting the variations for Service, which is why the MPC is in conflict with the showroom option book and perhaps common sense (or folk lore).

I would be most interested in a comparison of build sheets for the radiator/fan area, thinking that would be telling.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2018, 11:27:41 AM »
John L Yes, I thought of that possibility also. As you noted, the only way to know for sure is by the Build Sheets, as the Invoices and Marti Reports would just list "X/C Package", and/or "SelectAire" and not give their  contents.

Hopefully, some will have Build Sheets that can answer our questions.

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2018, 12:37:16 PM »
It appears that some of the questions can be answered in the "1967 Ford Engine Equipment Assembly Manual". However, since all Models are included, as well as all engines, with and without Thermactor, etc., it will take some time to sort through it. A quick look shows that a radiator with a different Part Number than the "Standard" radiator was
used for Extra Cooling and A/C. It also shows that the fan shroud is only used with Thermactor, and/or A/C. Then there is also an illustration that shows 289 Mustang with SelecAire and "Standard Cooling". This is in conflict with the Showroom Options book and the early (10/17/66) and late (5/29/67) Salesman's Price books I have, all of which note that the Extra Cooling Package is included with SelectAire. As I noted, this will take closer inspection and sorting through, but at least it's a place to start.

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9240
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2018, 06:28:09 PM »
Bob, I'm wondering if Ford from the start was limiting the variations for Service, which is why the MPC is in conflict with the showroom option book and perhaps common sense (or folk lore).

I would be most interested in a comparison of build sheets for the radiator/fan area, thinking that would be telling.
+1. I can remember reading recently in one of the Ford service manuals (but can't recall which) a Ford note at the bottom of the page indicating that the service radiators would be of the highest cooling capacity along with instruction of no need to unplug the auto cooling line plugs when used on a 4 speed application . As Jim surmised that is most likely why the MPC is in conflict with the showroom option book. 
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline teslaman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2018, 07:21:29 PM »
Was the extra cooling radiator still 20 inches wide? WCCC has a video in which they state a 24 inch radiator was used on cougars with AC or "heavy duty cooling". I don't know if that also applied to mustangs.
1967 San Jose deluxe coupe. Wimbledon White, vinyl top.
289 2V with C4 trans. PB, PS, T/E.

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9240
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2018, 07:55:43 PM »
Was the extra cooling radiator still 20 inches wide? WCCC has a video in which they state a 24 inch radiator was used on cougars with AC or "heavy duty cooling". I don't know if that also applied to mustangs.
Mustang is 20 inch.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline krelboyne

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1216
    • West Coast Classic Cougars
Re: 1967 Extra Cooling
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2018, 04:11:21 PM »
Was the extra cooling radiator still 20 inches wide? WCCC has a video in which they state a 24 inch radiator was used on cougars with AC or "heavy duty cooling". I don't know if that also applied to mustangs.

That video is a little confusing. We were suggesting an "upgrade" to a 24 inch radiator which was available starting in 1968.
Scott Behncke - Carcheaologist
West Coast Classic Cougars
503-463-1130
1968 GT/CS 302-4V San Jose 05B
1968 Cougar XR7 Dearborn 09A