Author Topic: Is this a factory GT?  (Read 5554 times)

Offline Josep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Is this a factory GT?
« on: May 13, 2016, 02:52:52 PM »
Hi,

Here is a VIN number coming from a FB 66 GT (?) from a friend of mine.
I say GT because there are several coincidences despite of several mods as well. 289 engine has been be replaced time ago for a 302. Interior looks correct, with instrument bezels and glove box de luxe. Gas cap, GT emblems on fenders, M U S T A N G pin letters looks also correct. But the VIN "tag" on apron looks extrange to me. Was that a "common" tag or VIN should had been casted on apron.?

Josep
« Last Edit: May 13, 2016, 06:21:19 PM by J_Speegle »
1966 Mustang Hardtop 200 Inline 6 - Arcadian Blue - C4 - Thermactor - 6R07T213966 - San Jose projected build date June 11th 1966 - DSO 71
1966 Mustang Convertible 289-2V - Vintage Burgundy - AT PS DB - 6F08C109403 - Dearborn projected build date September 9th 1965 - DSO 36

Offline ChrisV289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1984
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2016, 03:37:15 PM »
I don't see a picture of the tag...
« Last Edit: May 13, 2016, 06:21:49 PM by J_Speegle »
Chris
1965 Honey Gold Fastback (SJ 10/29/64)
1965 Caspian Blue Fastback (SJ 06/03/65)
2009 V6 Mustang Coupe

Offline sgl66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2016, 05:40:16 PM »
This is a good site to get you started with figuring out if the car may be a factory GT. A good place to start is the exhaust hangers especially behind the rear seat.
http://www.mustangdreams.com/verify-1965-1966-mustang-gt.htm

Aftermarket parts vendors have made lots of money selling GT dress up parts for many years. There are ways to tell the difference between factory (or Ford over the counter) from reproduction parts. Original gas caps have a unique stamp on the inside and numbers cast into them. (I posted a few pictures here last year) http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=6567.msg59788#msg59788

Foglights have FoMoCo stamped in them and a part number cast in the back (there is a repo fog light with a number cast in it a little different and no FoMoCo) GT badges (the ones in the picture look to be a different shade of red than what I have seen on original cars), GT exhuast tips measure slightly different than originals...and the list goes on.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2016, 06:26:49 PM by J_Speegle »
66 GT 6T09K12---- scheduled Oct 14, bucked Oct 13 '65

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24850
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2016, 06:25:03 PM »
First agree with Chris - no picture of the door tag, engine compartment VIN or buck tag (depending on where it was built)Of course nay of these can be faked or non-original to the car/body


People have been making GT's since the 70's  out of non-GT cars so many will have original parts installed on a car today. At the same time a factory GT can have a ton of repo parts on it and still be an original GT while a fake can have all original GT parts on it and still be non-factory.

A conclusion can only IMHO be drawn out of a full inspected looking for both what should be there (often included in published list of "How to tell if you have a GT") as well as features that should not be there.

Figuring out if a car is not  GT is allot easier than determining if the car is a factory GT. Easy ones start with the VIN with either a A or K engine code. But lack or presence of emblems is not since that has to include looking at the metal layer of the car to see if there were holes there originally and if the panel is original to the car.

Like any inspection of a car - its not easy no quick unless you uncover a fake quickly
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Josep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2016, 07:06:57 PM »
Oooopsssss..!!! Forgot to attach..!!
1966 Mustang Hardtop 200 Inline 6 - Arcadian Blue - C4 - Thermactor - 6R07T213966 - San Jose projected build date June 11th 1966 - DSO 71
1966 Mustang Convertible 289-2V - Vintage Burgundy - AT PS DB - 6F08C109403 - Dearborn projected build date September 9th 1965 - DSO 36

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24850
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2016, 07:11:45 PM »
Oooopsssss..!!! Forgot to attach..!!

Home made - non factory. Maybe a result of front panels being replaced or something much worst. Time for some particle disassembly and detective work
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Josep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2016, 07:22:11 PM »
That's what I thought Jeff. It looked like home made tag, with 'modern' rivits.
Car has no door tag nor engine tag.
sglbbs, thanks for info, will check these things next time I visit my friend.
Trumpet exhaust are exactly the same in the car as the ones in the link you post.
Also brake pedal is the same.


Josep
« Last Edit: May 13, 2016, 07:26:18 PM by Josep »
1966 Mustang Hardtop 200 Inline 6 - Arcadian Blue - C4 - Thermactor - 6R07T213966 - San Jose projected build date June 11th 1966 - DSO 71
1966 Mustang Convertible 289-2V - Vintage Burgundy - AT PS DB - 6F08C109403 - Dearborn projected build date September 9th 1965 - DSO 36

Offline sgl66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2016, 07:29:57 PM »
First agree with Chris - no picture of the door tag, engine compartment VIN or buck tag (depending on where it was built)Of course nay of these can be faked or non-original to the car/body


People have been making GT's since the 70's  out of non-GT cars so many will have original parts installed on a car today. At the same time a factory GT can have a ton of repo parts on it and still be an original GT while a fake can have all original GT parts on it and still be non-factory.

A conclusion can only IMHO be drawn out of a full inspected looking for both what should be there (often included in published list of "How to tell if you have a GT") as well as features that should not be there.

Figuring out if a car is not  GT is allot easier than determining if the car is a factory GT. Easy ones start with the VIN with either a A or K engine code. But lack or presence of emblems is not since that has to include looking at the metal layer of the car to see if there were holes there originally and if the panel is original to the car.

Like any inspection of a car - its not easy no quick unless you uncover a fake quickly

I agree with everything Jeff says. The link I provided is meant as a quick and easy cheat sheet but there are several other things not listed which should or....just as importantly....not be on a factory GT.
66 GT 6T09K12---- scheduled Oct 14, bucked Oct 13 '65

Offline sgl66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2016, 08:00:38 PM »
That's what I thought Jeff. It looked like home made tag, with 'modern' rivits.
Car has no door tag nor engine tag.
sglbbs, thanks for info, will check these things next time I visit my friend.
Trumpet exhaust are exactly the same in the car as the ones in the link you post.
Also brake pedal is the same.


Josep
Josep,

Think of that list as a beginners guide to GT items. The rubber "Disc Brake" pad on the pedal is easily swapped. What is not as easy to swap is the metal portion of the pedal. There is a difference between drum and disc. The trumpet louvers may look the same but there is a noticeable difference to the trained eye. There was a discussion on this site a few months ago about the trumpets and how to spot a repo.

There are 2 additional hidden VINs, one under each fender back toward the firewall. Good luck with your investigation
66 GT 6T09K12---- scheduled Oct 14, bucked Oct 13 '65

Offline Richard P.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2016, 08:02:33 PM »
If the 2ND letter in the VIN # is truly T it's a Metuchen car. Metuchen cars had a buck tag placed on the fender aprons. Your tag would show PIO for Performance Image Option thus GT.

Offline Josep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2016, 08:04:31 PM »
Great info sglbbs..!! Lots of things to look for next time I visit this guy.!
1966 Mustang Hardtop 200 Inline 6 - Arcadian Blue - C4 - Thermactor - 6R07T213966 - San Jose projected build date June 11th 1966 - DSO 71
1966 Mustang Convertible 289-2V - Vintage Burgundy - AT PS DB - 6F08C109403 - Dearborn projected build date September 9th 1965 - DSO 36

Offline Josep

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2016, 08:10:42 PM »
Richard, looks like it's a Metuchen car as for the buck tag shown, but I can't tell this tag is original, and looks it's not. A close view of the image shows the classic star at the end of the VIN, so maybe the original number is under the buck tag.!
1966 Mustang Hardtop 200 Inline 6 - Arcadian Blue - C4 - Thermactor - 6R07T213966 - San Jose projected build date June 11th 1966 - DSO 71
1966 Mustang Convertible 289-2V - Vintage Burgundy - AT PS DB - 6F08C109403 - Dearborn projected build date September 9th 1965 - DSO 36

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2016, 08:22:42 PM »
that is not the buck tag. it is a homemade vin  tag. maybe the panel was replaced & this is how the reinstalled a vin.
5F09C331248

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24850
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2016, 08:32:22 PM »
Richard, looks like it's a Metuchen car as for the buck tag shown, but I can't tell this tag is original, and looks it's not. A close view of the image shows the classic star at the end of the VIN, so maybe the original number is under the buck tag.!

Unfortunately (hope not) this home made and attached VIN tag is not over another VIN number. Of course it could be on the panel if the panel had been removed and used off a donor car but its going to cause some issues - especially in a non-US country. In the US it could first trigger a confiscation of the car and the owner would have to prove that they owned a car with that other number. Sure the paperwork only matches this top one.

Bottom line - we're all guessing and providing possibilities as well as warnings. You will not know until someone that knows what their looking at gets in there.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline ChrisV289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1984
Re: Is this a factory GT?
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2016, 09:03:54 PM »
Might need to check for the other 2 VINS on the car, one on the passenger side towards the cowel area and the other on the driver side by the hood hinge.  Both would require the fender to be loosened and moved out a bit or removed depending on how far in they stamped it...
Chris
1965 Honey Gold Fastback (SJ 10/29/64)
1965 Caspian Blue Fastback (SJ 06/03/65)
2009 V6 Mustang Coupe