Guess I'm a bit skeptical regarding waves/distortions after buffing. Taking out DA marks and scratches deep enough to catch a fingernail require a lot of material to be removed...
My concern also. Know I saw some reproduction glass on a car earlier this year that had waves in the glass also if you got the angle just right. Wouldn't be happy with that after money and or time was spent
All I remember is if you drag a fingernail across a scratch in the glass and you can feel it "snag", the glass is beyond help, otherwise, try Eastwood for buffing stuff.
Jim
I do understand the concerns along the lines of the quotes above, considering the Concours Nature of this forum. The only true acid test is, if the glass doesn't look EXACTLY like new, and ONLY with the correct dates and correct logos, placed in the exact same location and on the same side of the glass as it would have been on the day the car was actually built, it stands the chance of taking deductions when it comes to the Show Field or Judging.
New is New. (Polished) Used glass will likely never pass examination under a microscope, I get that. If you want brand new dated glass then go through that process and buy the glass new and have it dated or leave it as was delivered (without dates). That option will yield you New Glass results, which, as I understand, fall short of "Concours" standards as well, most notably on TINTED glass, which is what I have been working on.
It all boils down to choices, we have to all make choices on our projects. When you consider that I began with "damaged beyond use" glass, I felt that anything I could do to re-use the original, dated glass ...getting it as close as practical to "exactly like brand-new" again, would better than the alternative choices IMHO.
This process DOES make it completely "usable" again, and probably nicer that you could ever expect if you had a "before" vs. "after" look at it in person. I did try and shoot a video of not only the damage but also the finished product but in neither video, could you really make out the full extent of either the damage nor the finished product. I was concerned that this endeavor would be dismal, that I would still be unhappy with the results. That concern has been removed. SEEING IS BELIEVING.