I will add that the installation is the same on Convertible Fastback & Coupe.
Richard : I must take exception to this statement. At first, when I looked at both your and Jeroen’s measurements, I thought that mine must be different (it was ordered with the Rocker Panel Moldings – confirmed in Marti Report) because it’s a Convertible; or possibly because it was built in Dearborn; or even because it was an “Early” build. The difference being that mine has 6 of the “L” nylon clips (as shown in the attached illustrations), plus the front Fender stud (shown as “M” in the illustrations). At first I thought that both of you only included the dimensions to the “L” clips on the
Rocker Panel itself; but then saw that, on Fastbacks (according to the illustration), there are no “L” clips on the front fender. Thus, either both of you forgot the dimension to the 6th “L” clip, or San Jose “cheated” and only used 5 ? For someone who is either adding the Rocker Panel Moldings to a car that did not have them originally, or someone who has a car that has had the sheet metal replaced with pieces without the holes for the clips,
all of the dimensions are needed for a complete installation. In addition, I’m not sure exactly where the 14” dimension is taken from (I’ve noted it as 14”? on the attached “doctored up” illustration). If I have shown it in the incorrect place, please advise. Also, if both you and Jeroen (as a double check) would provide the “missing” dimension, I can complete my “doctored up” drawing and provide, hopefully, what Ralf was asking for. When I have access to my Convertible in several weeks, I’ll make the necessary measurements on it, and provide that as a follow up to this Post.
I would also say if using Jeroen's measurements and the information on the Ford instructions Marty supplied, you would get a really good idea how these are installed.
As far as following the dimensions that you and Jeroen have provided,
along with those on the sheet that ruppstang provided, I would
not use the dimensions on the sheet provided by ruppstang. After looking closely at the instructions that Marty provided, one can see that they are, as previously noted by you, for
installation on a 1969, which as shown on the sheet, used different clips than those for ’67-68 from the Factory, and, as it appears (at least according to the illustration on the Instruction Sheet), different spacing also. The instructions are noted for either replacing moldings on cars that had them from the Factory (and had been scraped, dented, etc.), and for cars that didn’t come with the Rocker Panel Moldings initially. I am not very familiar with ‘69’s, but it must have had a very narrow RPM compared to ’67-68, based on the size of the clips (considerably shorter). Since for 1969, only the Mach 1’s and Grandes came “Standard” with the Rocker Panel Moldings, and for other Models, one had to either order the car with the Exterior Décor Option (which included the RPM’s), or order them as a separate Option, I can see the reason for the 1969 RPM Kit being available. What I don’t understand is why, in the case of replacing damaged moldings on a ’69, or adding to a car that didn’t originally have RPM’s, the clips (and presumably the moldings themselves), were 1967’s. Maybe someone could shed some light on this ??
In any case, the spacing of the clips on 1969 Models is different than 1967-68.
I have attached pictures of a “doctored up” copy of the Instruction Sheet for the 1969 RPM Kit (as supplied earlier by ruppstang), Exterior Molding Sheets showing number and type of clips used on all 3 ’67 Body styles (these are from the 1960-68 MPC with sheets dated February 1967 and December 1968), and a side view of my ’67 Convertible with the Rocker Panel Moldings removed, showing the location of the Factory installed 6 nylon clips and the front fender stud (you’ll need to zoom in to see them well).
In “SUMMARY” :
1) All 1967 Rocker Panel Molding Clip locations are not “created equal”. While it may turn out that the spacing between clips, and between the last clip and the front fender stud is the same on all 3 Models (Coupe, Convertible and Fastback), their physical location in relation to the Front Fender is not the same (this is particularly applicable since Ralf’s is a Convertible).
2) It appears that the dimension between the 5th and 6th Clip is missing, and needs to be provided.
3) The location of the 14” dimension needs to be confirmed/provided.
4) Do not use the Clip Spacing dimensions shown on the Instruction Sheet provided by ruppstang on ‘67’s or 68’s. That sheet is for a Kit specifically to be used on 1969’s.
5) Any information on why the ’67 Clips were used in the 1969 RPM Kit (and presumably the 1967-68 RPM’s themselves) would be of interest.
6) Measurements from known Factory installations of the RPM’s on all 3 Models should be confirmed and compared (including physical locations).
7) Dimensions and location on ’68 Models should be taken and compared to verify that they are the same as on ‘67’s.
Information provided for Models other than my ’67 Dearborn Convertible is based on dimensions from Richard's and Jeroens’ measurements, as well as locations shown in the Body Illustrations Section of the 1960-68 MPC.
I trust this will get us on the way to getting this resolved.
Bob