Author Topic: GT 350 axel code 1  (Read 2500 times)

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
GT 350 axel code 1
« on: August 22, 2021, 11:02:41 AM »
I was looking at a 68 GT 350 Marti report and it listed a 1 code for the rear axel as being a 3.89:1 conventional. In my tag decoder book it lists a 1 as 2.75:1 conventional. The decoder book does not even list a code for a 3.89:1 axel.

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: GT 350 axle code 1
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2021, 11:19:07 AM »
Here is the MPC data that confirms what you are seeing.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: GT 350 axel code 1
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2021, 01:07:21 PM »
Welcome to the wonderful world of Ford codes.
AXEL, the Norwegian auto mechanic, told me that Ford did that A LOT of that on AXLES, fighting to use a DUEL code system that actually was not a DUAL system at all. YOU'RE seeing a solution where Ford installed something in YOUR car that was not an option for that year. So they "improvised" for the codes (I got a similar situation for a 66 "K" code convertible using 65 interior trim and exterior paint codes). Call it an anomaly, call it odd, THERE is no simple answer to THEIR codes.
Why Ford did not use the special order code combined with the DSO is a good question - a question with an answer lost in time.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: GT 350 axel code 1
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2021, 01:16:05 PM »
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline Coralsnake

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 935
Re: GT 350 axel code 1
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2021, 01:40:54 PM »
The Shelby codes are not the same as the standard Ford codes.

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
Re: GT 350 axel code 1
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2021, 02:07:16 PM »
Thank you guys for your help. I had seen a chart that shows the Shelby exceptions but could not remember where. I should have known that the answer would be on Pete's web site.