Author Topic: Date on 66 bumper  (Read 1933 times)

Offline 1966KGT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Date on 66 bumper
« on: March 02, 2021, 10:45:31 PM »
My 66 SJ K CODE GT has a date of 4 8 M3 on the front bumper, I am assuming it is a service replacement from  April 8th M3, being 1973? I assume this after looking in the library for date coding.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2021, 01:18:25 AM by J_Speegle »
1966 K GT, BUILT 11/08/65 4 SPEED, SAN JOSE CAR, 1969 Mustang convertible, 1970 MACH 1, 1963 GALAXIE Q code Fastback, 1966 mustang t code coupe, fuel injected

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7688
Re: 66 bumper
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2021, 12:06:24 AM »
My 66 SJ K CODE GT has a date of 4 8 M3 on the front bumper, I am assuming it is a service replacement from  April 8th M3, being 1973? I assume this after looking in the library for date coding.

Yes, most likely 73, or maybe 83.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline JohnB

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
  • 0F03R120303
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2021, 04:20:05 AM »
Not sure, but does not the M3 indicate Monroe Stamping plant, 3 shift?


Offline 1966KGT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2021, 08:41:23 AM »
And the search begins!!!!
1966 K GT, BUILT 11/08/65 4 SPEED, SAN JOSE CAR, 1969 Mustang convertible, 1970 MACH 1, 1963 GALAXIE Q code Fastback, 1966 mustang t code coupe, fuel injected

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7688
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2021, 10:57:07 AM »
Not sure, but does not the M3 indicate Monroe Stamping plant, 3 shift?

Lots of previous discussions on this here.

On original cars, the number appears to correspond to the model year.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline 1966KGT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2021, 09:49:06 AM »
Would it be a stretch that a bumper dated 3 26 M5 could have been at the bottom of a rack of assy. line bumpers and was finally used in months later assembly? 11/08/65 San Jose. Possibly was in the wrong staging area for some time?
1966 K GT, BUILT 11/08/65 4 SPEED, SAN JOSE CAR, 1969 Mustang convertible, 1970 MACH 1, 1963 GALAXIE Q code Fastback, 1966 mustang t code coupe, fuel injected

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7688
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2021, 11:47:45 AM »
Would it be a stretch that a bumper dated 3 26 M5 could have been at the bottom of a rack of assy. line bumpers and was finally used in months later assembly? 11/08/65 San Jose. Possibly was in the wrong staging area for some time?

Yes.  A bumper dated over 7 months prior would be a stretch.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
Re: Date on 66 bumper
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2021, 05:10:34 PM »
......................... Possibly was in the wrong staging area for some time?

A single bumper would not be laying around. Think the statement above may be a stretch to make things fit rather than reflect common practices and patterns
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)