Author Topic: 1968 GT Shocks  (Read 2361 times)

Offline preaction

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1330
Re: 1968 GT Shocks
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2018, 10:12:09 PM »
Does anyone recognize an Autolite auto-flex heavy duty shock C8PF-18045-Y clearly not a mustang part but its the same size and length of a mustang rear shock I couldn't find an application for a "C8PF"
8F02R218047-  July 18 1968   Dearborn

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24627
Re: 1968 GT Shocks
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2018, 10:53:18 PM »
Does anyone recognize an Autolite auto-flex heavy duty shock C8PF-18045-Y clearly not a mustang part but its the same size and length of a mustang rear shock I couldn't find an application for a "C8PF"

Guess you asking if the shock would be considered original. No  for a number of reasons. Finish, some are not shaped like originals, markings are different , though some markings/stampings are suppose to be ignored in some classes by some organizations.

The xxPF is often used as a more universal fit part number used for some service replacement parts. Have some NOS carbs marked/identified that way
« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 02:06:57 AM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline bullitt68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2206
Mike
1968 Mustang Fastback GT 390 Raven Black, 4 speed
8R02S162374, San Jose, June 5, 1968

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24627
Re: 1968 GT Shocks
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2018, 02:04:38 AM »
Thanks. So NOS is the way to go

Not always. Using examples like the EPay one it might take you a couple of years to find a full set of four  and as mentioned they would not (in this example) would not be 100% correct for your car as suggested in earlier responses.

If you worried or your goal is related to having the car judged (depending on class and organization running the show) then the design features are more important (shape, color, thread count...) than having the date or part number correct. If not for judging the AUTOLITE markings and correct date might be more important

If you could find a full set of the exact correct shocks that matched the assembly line installed ones for your car, completion date and assembly plant yes NOS would be the best choice IMHO

Restoring is often about choices.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 02:10:34 AM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline bullitt68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2206
Re: 1968 GT Shocks
« Reply #19 on: November 16, 2018, 02:27:54 AM »
Not always. Using examples like the EPay one it might take you a couple of years to find a full set of four  and as mentioned they would not (in this example) would not be 100% correct for your car as suggested in earlier responses.

If you worried or your goal is related to having the car judged (depending on class and organization running the show) then the design features are more important (shape, color, thread count...) than having the date or part number correct. If not for judging the AUTOLITE markings and correct date might be more important

If you could find a full set of the exact correct shocks that matched the assembly line installed ones for your car, completion date and assembly plant yes NOS would be the best choice IMHO

Restoring is often about choices.

Thanks Jeff. Thats great information
« Last Edit: November 16, 2018, 10:58:26 AM by bullitt68 »
Mike
1968 Mustang Fastback GT 390 Raven Black, 4 speed
8R02S162374, San Jose, June 5, 1968