Author Topic: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v  (Read 889 times)

Offline mmbz67a

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« on: May 06, 2018, 03:39:24 PM »
So I've found what I believe to be a period correct intake for my car, but not sure. C9ZE 9425 B with date code 8H14, my car was produced march 26 (1969 390-4V 3.25 traction lock, four-speed close ratio manual transmission. 
« Last Edit: May 06, 2018, 03:42:50 PM by mmbz67a »

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2018, 08:07:17 PM »
Think 8 months prior to the car completion date is a bit of a stretch


Looking at 67 and 68's where I have more data the intakes compared to casting date of the blocks were the same month or the month prior
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline mmbz67a

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2018, 10:36:40 PM »
Why would an intake be made 8 months before production of the 1969 motors and stamped for 1969 era but have 1968 build date? Unless Ford was trying to stock up in advance.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2018, 10:50:30 PM »
Why would an intake be made 8 months before production of the 1969 motors and stamped for 1969 era but have 1968 build date? .

It wasn't. The 8 months was referencing the date spread between the casting date of the intake shown  8H (Aug 68) and when you reported the car was completed Mar 26 69. I stated an approximate span to be more specific it was 7 months and 10 days between the two dates you provided

It was late Aug 1968 when regular production started rolling at all three plants. "Pre-production 1969 vehicle's for special purposes were built slightly earlier. Engines, in preparation for the model release and the new "production year" were built before that date so the building of the 69 engines would have likely started in July some time or in some cases slightly before that for the few preproduction cars so they would be ready for the unveiling, brochure shots, and other advertising needs as well as all the crash, emission and other testing required for a new car.

They didn't start building or introducing the new model car at the beginning of the calendar year.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2018, 10:53:11 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline mmbz67a

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2018, 04:12:35 AM »
So this intake would be Concorse correct as it is 1969 mach1 Mustang Part?

Offline BKnapp

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2018, 07:59:53 AM »
Yes, but I think it would be more appropriate for a car built Late August to mid Oct 1968. I would think your casting date should be closer to 9B## or 9C#.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2018, 08:02:33 AM by BKnapp »
Bill

‘67 390 Coupe A/T  P/S  P/B. (Built 1/4/1967)  7R01S145xxx
‘67 390 FB A/T P/S P/B (Built 3/10/1967) 7F02S173xxx
2007 Shelby GT500 40th Anniv.  Convert. #125

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: Correct parts? 1969 390 4v
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2018, 03:01:46 PM »
Depends on your goal. It appears that you found the type of intake used on your engine originally but its not dated correctly (within normal production range) for your car.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)