Topic: Different OEM cross-members?

[MustangAndFairlane1867]

In my boxes of parts I've come across two different front cross-member supports. Notice in the attached pictures that one of them has two large (thick) washers tack welded to the supports ends where the attaching bolts would pass through.  I don't know if this was factory, or maybe performed for unknown reasons by a previous owner.  I'm in the process re-assembling at 1965 K code fastback (San Jose/2.16.1965) that's been apart for several years and at this point I'm unsure which of these cross-members is correct for my project (though I suspect it's the cross-member without the large washers).  Any thoughts?  Thank you, Ron

[jwc66k]

For judging purposes, go with the "stock" piece. The one with the washers would be accepted if accompanied with documentation.
Jim

[Bob Gaines]

In my boxes of parts I've come across two different front cross-member supports. Notice in the attached pictures that one of them has two large (thick) washers tack welded to the supports ends where the attaching bolts would pass through.  I don't know if this was factory, or maybe performed for unknown reasons by a previous owner.  I'm in the process re-assembling at 1965 K code fastback (San Jose/2.16.1965) that's been apart for several years and at this point I'm unsure which of these cross-members is correct for my project (though I suspect it's the cross-member without the large washers).  Any thoughts?  Thank you, Ron

Ron, go with the stock cross member (no washers) are my thoughts .  That is if you want factory look.  The other cross member is a owner modified item IMO. I am unaware of any benefits that the added spacers would give even if you didn't want a stock look. I am however curious of what the spacers would could have been for. 

[carlite65]

my 2cents on  the spacers..........someone did not have the proper bolts for this application. have seen similar 'rigged' setups.

[MustangAndFairlane1867]

I thought maybe the PO who did this had a larger (deeper) oil pan or a different motor he wanted to install and need the extra clearance.  These washers might have served as spacers for that additional 1/4" (+/-) that he needed.  Ron

[jwc66k]

Ah, the "Shelby" shock tower mod on top applied to the "Shelby" oil pan mod on the bottom.
Jim

[Bob Gaines]

Ah, the "Shelby" shock tower mod on top applied to the "Shelby" oil pan mod on the bottom.
Jim

[J_Speegle]

Have seen this done before for a creative solution for header or oil pan clearance. Lot neater finished look on a modified car that other options