Author Topic: '65 Coil Date Code  (Read 10283 times)

Offline sgl66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2016, 01:53:19 PM »
Is there an expected timeline for when FoMoCo was phased out and replaced with Autolite?
66 GT 6T09K12---- scheduled Oct 14, bucked Oct 13 '65

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9317
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2016, 01:56:00 PM »
Is there an expected timeline for when FoMoCo was phased out and replaced with Autolite?
Mid 66 production I believe.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Texas Swede

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2016, 08:26:38 PM »
Well, there isn't a lot of room below the coil and the top of the front cover/aluminum water pump/oil dip stick tube bracket. For the stamp to be fully visible the stamp must be placed
higher up on the coil, i.e. non original location.
See picture from the attached original picture of 5S114 in Paris, France 1965.
Texas Swede

Offline sgl66

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2016, 08:50:12 PM »
66 GT 6T09K12---- scheduled Oct 14, bucked Oct 13 '65

Offline goumoun

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #34 on: September 29, 2016, 11:19:37 AM »
See pictures. Dec 15 1964
On mine, the stamp is hidden from factory. I have seen exactly the same on others from this era. The pictures also show the proper orientation and level of the coil in support.
 
65A  K  25  15M  91  1  6
5F07A372xxx

Offline rodster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #35 on: September 29, 2016, 11:24:00 AM »
Great pictures.   It's ashamed the factory hid such a neat concours detail.  What were they thinking?  ;D
1965 Dearborn Mustang Coupe
Raven Black - Palomino Pony
1967 Dearborn Mustang Conv.
Wimbeldon White - Red
1984 SVO - 2A

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7339
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2016, 12:44:08 PM »
It's ashamed the factory hid such a neat concours detail.  What were they thinking?  ;D
This may come as a shock to you and a lot of others, but Ford was not building concourse grade cars.  :-X
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7684
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2016, 01:58:52 PM »
This may come as a shock to you and a lot of others, but Ford was not building concourse grade cars.  :-X
Jim

From an authenticity perspective they were, but certainly not from a workmanship/condition/cleanliness... lol
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7339
Re: '65 Coil Date Code
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2016, 04:03:50 PM »
From an authenticity perspective they were, but certainly not from a workmanship/condition/cleanliness... lol
Which is why Ford dealerships had a "dealer prep" stage, and many cars were also retrofitted, "Ship it, let the dealer take care of that screw up."
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.