Author Topic: 68 idler arms comparaison !?  (Read 1380 times)

Offline mhubert89

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
68 idler arms comparaison !?
« on: July 13, 2016, 05:22:13 PM »
Hi ,

I saw 2 types of idler arms. One is built in one piece and bolt to the frame rail and the other one have a bracket like the black one in the picture ! What is the difference between this 2 ? The one piece its good for a p/s car ?
Mustang Fastback 1968
289, 4 speed
Built in Dearborn on April 16th

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24620
Re: 68 idler arms comparaison !?
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2016, 06:03:16 PM »
The bottom one is the correct style of the two. Other style is a aftermarket design often seen





Right this moment I can't recall if castle or jam nut is correct for the idler bracket nut in 68 but sure others will chime in :)



http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=1887.msg9627#msg9627

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=1900.msg9704#msg9704

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=6145.0


« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 06:07:45 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9360
Re: 68 idler arms comparaison !?
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2016, 11:33:42 PM »
The idler arm is the weakest link in the steering. They are typically the most common item replaced. The nut on the bottom is a cone shaped lock nut . It is larger but similar to the style used on the rear end center section.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9360
Re: 68 idler arms comparaison !?
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2016, 11:40:17 PM »
The idler arm is the weakest link in the steering. They are typically the most common item replaced. The nut on the bottom is a cone shaped lock nut . It is larger but similar to the style used on the rear end center section.
They can be rebuilt but it is a pain. The original assemblyline style is hard to find now. I try to keep a few rebuilt ones around .  Chockostang ? Sells a very moderately priced respectable replacement alternative that although not concours correct is better looking then any other replacement I have seen . I would not think twice about using it on a driver car for a original look.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline mhubert89

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Re: 68 idler arms comparaison !?
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2016, 12:31:13 AM »
Sound good , thanks everyone !
Mustang Fastback 1968
289, 4 speed
Built in Dearborn on April 16th