Author Topic: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback  (Read 2116 times)

Offline 266ks

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« on: April 24, 2016, 08:55:30 PM »
I need a pair of bottom leaf springs for a Dec 1964 k-code fastback. Any lead would help.   

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2016, 05:58:44 AM »
Just to help a little - they will be marked C4AZ 5556  S and an appropriate date below that
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2016, 11:52:25 AM »
Just to help a little - they will be marked C4AZ 5556  S and an appropriate date below that
Wouldn't that be C4ZA?
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2016, 12:19:43 PM »
Wouldn't that be C4ZA?
Jim

Ahh, come on! Cut the ole' dog some slack, Jim...look at what hour of the day he posted the reply  ;)
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2016, 04:40:18 PM »
Just to help a little - they will be marked C4AZ 5556  S and an appropriate date below that
Wouldn't that be C4ZA?
Jim
Ahh, come on! Cut the ole' dog some slack, Jim...look at what hour of the day he posted the reply  ;)
Well, OK. C4AZ applies - except in California, the other lower 48 states, North of the Equator, South of the Equator and two small islands in the middle of the Artic Ocean.
Jim
PS - I'm older than he is anyway.
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2016, 06:52:18 PM »
Wow - dyslexia and ole' dog comments in the same thread   ::)

But its good we have prefect individuals here to help challenged old seniors around the home here   :'(

Must keep you busy   :-X
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7346
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2016, 07:31:15 PM »
Wow - dyslexia and ole' dog comments in the same thread   ::)

But its good we have prefect individuals here to help challenged old seniors around the home here   :'(

Must keep you busy   :-X
What? You'll have to speak up. My hearing ain't what it used to be.
But as long as we're on the subject, what is the difference between C4ZA-5556-K, -L, -S and -Y springs? Ford Car Parts list all those 650 pound variations (replace by C5ZZ-5560-E which was discontinued as of May, 75) for Convertibles and Fastbacks (thru 66) with the "K" code engine. Hardtop HP's have their own series of four dash letters (and four non-HP), plus there is another 650 pound series of four dash letters for non-HP and I-6 Convertibles and Fastbacks.
I see possible answers as: date related (early, mid and late production); different vendors; different plants - what?
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline WT8095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 941
  • Dave Z.
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2016, 08:57:53 AM »
But as long as we're on the subject, what is the difference between C4ZA-5556-K, -L, -S and -Y springs? Ford Car Parts list all those 650 pound variations (replace by C5ZZ-5560-E which was discontinued as of May, 75) for Convertibles and Fastbacks (thru 66) with the "K" code engine. Hardtop HP's have their own series of four dash letters (and four non-HP), plus there is another 650 pound series of four dash letters for non-HP and I-6 Convertibles and Fastbacks.
I see possible answers as: date related (early, mid and late production); different vendors; different plants - what?

Some discussion here:

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=12284.msg75376#msg75376

The differences are in spring rate, which is the distance a spring deflects under a given load and is listed in lb/in. Spring rate is not listed in the MPCs - instead, Ford used a unfortunately similar-sounding term load rate, which indicates how much weight the spring is designed to carry, but is not descriptive of the stiffness of the spring. For example, a 650 lb load rate spring that has 100 lb/in spring rate will give a soft cushy ride. A 650 lb load rate spring that has 300 lb/in spring rate is going to give a much firmer, maybe even harsh ride. Of course ride quality also depends on sprung weight vs. unsprung weight, but that gets into a much longer discussion...
Dave Z.

'68 fastback, S-code + C6. Special Paint (Rainbow promotion), DSO 710784. Actual build date 2/7/1968, San Jose.
'69 Cougar convertible, 351W-2V + FMX, Meadowlark Yellow.

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2016, 09:13:19 AM »
Some discussion here:

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=12284.msg75376#msg75376

The differences are in spring rate, which is the distance a spring deflects under a given load and is listed in lb/in. Spring rate is not listed in the MPCs - instead, Ford used a unfortunately similar-sounding term load rate, which indicates how much weight the spring is designed to carry, but is not descriptive of the stiffness of the spring. For example, a 650 lb load rate spring that has 100 lb/in spring rate will give a soft cushy ride. A 650 lb load rate spring that has 300 lb/in spring rate is going to give a much firmer, maybe even harsh ride. Of course ride quality also depends on sprung weight vs. unsprung weight, but that gets into a much longer discussion...

A very good way to explain springs & various engineering designs. ;)

Dave, you have now become my "unsprung" hero!
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline WT8095

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 941
  • Dave Z.
Re: rear springs for a Dec 1964 built fastback
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2016, 09:43:28 AM »
Dave, you have now become my "unsprung" hero!

Where's the "forehead slap" emoji???   ;D
Dave Z.

'68 fastback, S-code + C6. Special Paint (Rainbow promotion), DSO 710784. Actual build date 2/7/1968, San Jose.
'69 Cougar convertible, 351W-2V + FMX, Meadowlark Yellow.