Topic: My 1993 Feature Car 'Resto' thread - YELANOR

[KevinMac]

As happy as I was to land the h-pipe over this past winter, yesterday's haul makes that look like peanuts! Here is the back of my truck all loaded up for the drive home:



In it are:

- (L/R) 0 mile takeoff tailpipes and mufflers.

These things are mint as they are uncut. Someone actually had the mind to take them off the correct way! 



- (4) Michelin Pilot XGT Z4 Tires (225/55ZR16)

The tires are also takeoffs from a Feature Car. Being that they are 22+ years old I won't be able to drive on them but for Unrestored class, which looks to be the direction I am headed, these are perfect!



- Motorcraft BX-58C Battery

The holy grail!!!  This little beauty is period correct but not date correct as it date coded for a '94. Since date codes on batteries aren't judged for Unrestored it will work just fine for me until if/when I find a '93 date coded one. For 21 years old, the labels on this thing are immaculate.



The list of parts I still need now is greatly reduced and I will have a fun winter of preparing the car for summer 2016!

[carlite65]

'The holy grail!!!  This little beauty is period correct but not date correct as it date coded for a '94. Since date codes on batteries aren't judged for Unrestored it will work just fine for me until if/when I find a '93 date coded one. For 21 years old, the labels on this thing are immaculate.'

actually date codes are checked in the unrestored class. one of the things that verifies the definition of unrestored. items are not removed to check though.

[KevinMac]

'The holy grail!!!  This little beauty is period correct but not date correct as it date coded for a '94. Since date codes on batteries aren't judged for Unrestored it will work just fine for me until if/when I find a '93 date coded one. For 21 years old, the labels on this thing are immaculate.'

actually date codes are checked in the unrestored class. one of the things that verifies the definition of unrestored. items are not removed to check though.

Hmm..interesting. Tom, who is a judge, said not.  Oh well