Author Topic: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please  (Read 3847 times)

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7687
Re: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2016, 03:53:17 PM »
Obvious explanation is to minimize vibration/noises.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Online jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7347
Re: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please
« Reply #16 on: December 12, 2016, 04:41:23 PM »
Jeff what was the purpose for sealing between the hood and the hinge...I've never noticed that detail before.
Honestly have no idea. Have found this and a more brownish sealer used on a number (no pattern) of unrestored first year Mustangs at San Jose. Since its always on both it seems to be intentional just don't see the purpose but maybe there was a worker or engineer that had one
The calk was used as a "moveable" retainer for adjusting the hood on the assembly line. The bolts were tight enough to hold the hood in position with the calk, but loose enough to be "adjusted" with a rubber mallet. It was done at the same time as the fenders that also used calk. When the hood and fenders were aligned, the bolts were set firm. The calk did reduce sound and vibration and kept the hood and fenders in alignment. I got this info from a former San Jose assembly line worker.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24628
Re: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please
« Reply #17 on: December 12, 2016, 07:59:26 PM »
The calk was used as a "moveable" retainer for adjusting the hood on the assembly line,................... I got this info from a former San Jose assembly line worker.

Thanks Jim hadn't found that worker or another that shared that. Wonder what they changed in the process to do away with it after that short period. Wonder if it was an early 60's thing that may have started with the unibody cars (cheaper) models.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Online jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7347
Re: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2016, 09:03:43 PM »
John (his name, no last name known) came to my Super Bowl Party a couple of years ago. When I found out he worked at the San Jose plant in Milpitas, I dragged him out to the garage. He said "wow!". The hood of my "K" Fastback was still up from a previous "tour" of party types. So I got some one-on-one Q & A about the front of the car. He showed me where and how they "adjusted" the hood and fenders, one guy on the right and one on the left. Then we went inside and watched the Seahawks stomp the Broncos.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline mtinkham

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
  • That'll be easy
Re: October 20th 1964 San Jose Engine bay details please
« Reply #19 on: December 13, 2016, 01:53:13 PM »
Thanks Jim.

If John said "wow" in your garage...I wonder what he would say about an entire website dedicated to the study of the methods used by him and his peers.

Mark
1967 S-code Fastback, GT, 3-speed manual, Metuchen, Scheduled 04-21-1967 - Actual 04-25-1967