Author Topic: Interesting '67 K-Code  (Read 2152 times)

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Interesting '67 K-Code
« on: November 10, 2016, 10:56:17 AM »
Just ran across this on Barn Finds.  Looks like a good builder car, but it's a shame it wasn't stored somewhere in the dry.  Looks like someone has been migrating deluxe interior parts into it, too.  It's already waaaaay beyond what I would pay for it in the shape it's in.

http://barnfinds.com/1-of-1-1967-k-code-mustang-lean-to-find/

Here's the fleaBay auction: http://www.ebay.com/itm/252624553517?rmvSB=true


Too much junk, too little time.

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2016, 01:03:30 PM »
Just ran across this on Barn Finds.  Looks like a good builder car, but it's a shame it wasn't stored somewhere in the dry. Looks like someone has been migrating deluxe interior parts into it, too. It's already waaaaay beyond what I would pay for it in the shape it's in.

http://barnfinds.com/1-of-1-1967-k-code-mustang-lean-to-find/

Here's the fleaBay auction: http://www.ebay.com/itm/252624553517?rmvSB=true

The door lower grille, a part of the Deluxe Interior Package, is all I see there. Those are the "Speaker Grilles" for Factory Installed 8 Track option on Standard Interior Cars. Looks legit ;)
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2016, 02:12:30 PM »
I dunno, it appeared to have a brushed aluminum instrument cluster, but none of the other brushed aluminum stuff.
Too much junk, too little time.

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2016, 02:15:24 PM »
Wait, scratch that.  It actually is the correct camera case bezel.  Would it have come with a tach from the factory?  I didn't see it listed on the Marti Report.
Too much junk, too little time.

Offline Hipo giddyup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
  • There is no end to doing right. Giddyup!!!
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2016, 04:14:44 PM »
Still a unique car to own! I like the optional "JC" bar installed on the dash.  ;D
1967 Springtime Yellow Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Metuchen built, Nov. 17th 66'
1966 Sahara Beige Coupe, 289 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, July 21st 66'
1964 1/2 Pagoda Green Coupe, 260 2v 3spd, Dearborn built, June 30th 64'
1966 GT350 Fastback clone, 289 HiPo, 725cfm Holley, 4spd, SanJose built, Nov 25th 65'

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2016, 04:45:07 PM »
Wait, scratch that.  It actually is the correct camera case bezel.  Would it have come with a tach from the factory?  I didn't see it listed on the Marti Report.
The tach was included with the K and S code 4 speeds, not requiring a separate cost option.  I don't think that was the case for T, C, and A codes.   If the option was chosen when not included, I think the tach was 6,000 RPM, but the K and S code 4 speeds were 8,000 RPM.  I don't recall ever seeing a definitive document or position based on survey of unrestored cars to cover all the bases.   Also there were changes along the way which makes it more difficult.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline drummingrocks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2016, 04:55:32 PM »
The tach was included with the K and S code 4 speeds, not requiring a separate cost option. 

Gotcha, I thought that might be the case with the tach.
Too much junk, too little time.

Offline preaction

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1330
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2016, 05:29:40 PM »
Typical NY, Pa, NJ rust issues all mustangs from these states look like that.
8F02R218047-  July 18 1968   Dearborn

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5093
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2016, 05:40:50 PM »
The tach was included with the K and S code 4 speeds, not requiring a separate cost option.  I don't think that was the case for T, C, and A codes. 

+1

and the 8K tachs I know were on the K-codes w/4 speeds, I'd have to research other applications besides Shelby's.
Otherwise, the RPO setup was typically seen as the 6K tach. Seen several over the years on unrestored C-codes, A-codes and S-codes, most were auto trans cars though.
I've seen one unrestored K-code fastback GTA's without the tach
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7349
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2016, 12:12:12 AM »
Typical NY, Pa, NJ rust issues all mustangs from these states look like that.
Include any state that used salt on the roads in winter.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline 67350#1242

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Interesting '67 K-Code
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2016, 06:08:18 PM »
Interesting no "K" in engine and trans. stampings. 
67 Coupe SJ 11/16/66
67 GT350 SJ 2/01/67